geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <c1vams...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Geronimo Tomcat 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT: SESSIONS.ser written to workDir
Date Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:06:01 GMT
BTW, this problem (or situation) applies to all versions of Geronimo.  I
have verified it on 1.1.1 and 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT versions.

++Vamsi

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1vamsi1c@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Jacek Laskowski <jacek@laskowski.net.pl>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
> > <c1vamsi1c@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > With Geronimo Tomcat 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT, when a web app is stopped, I am
> > > noticing that the call to stop() in GeronimoStandardContext.kill() is
> > making
> > > the sessions to be written to a SESSIONS.ser under the workDir for the
> > > application.  But then destroy() called immediately is resulting in
> > the
> > > deletion of the workDir altogether.  Under what situations will this
> > workDir
> > > be not deleted and how this SESSIONS.ser will be used/supposed to be
> > used?
> >
> > What's 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT? I have never seen it mentioned before.
>
> It is the server built from branches\2.0.
>
>  Should
> > we care about it rather than pushing 2.1 to our end users?
>
> I think we should care about it too, for the users who are already using a
> 2.0.x server may not want to move to 2.1 until 2.1 stabilizes a bit.
>
>
> > Why are you
> > working with the older version?
>
> My Win XP crashes when I build "geronimo-system" module from 2.1.  I could
> not figure the reason, but it has something to do with the model of my
> ThinkPad :o(.
>
>
> >
> > Jacek
> >
> > --
> > Jacek Laskowski
> > http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message