geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet" <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: problem with spec releases
Date Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:00:23 GMT
Given these legal problems, I'm cancelling all the votes I've started and will
start a *single* one for all the specs asap.

On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guillaume,
> I'm extremely sorry to say that the javadoc and sources jars all seem to be
> missing the required license and notice files.
>
> Not sure what might have changed, build-wise. The previous versions contain
> them -- geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-javadoc.jar and
> geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-sources.jar However, they are missing from
> the candidate jars -- geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1-javadoc.jar and
> geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1-sources.jar
>
> I sampled additional jars and it seems to be a problem in all of the new
> specs.
>
> Something we overlooked, previously, is
> geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.1/src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
>
> The license/notice file for geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec should contain the w3c
> license (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720, I
> believe) and an attribution in the notice file.
>
> Other than the above, all looks good.
>
> --kevan



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message