geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet" <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: problem with spec releases
Date Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:08:28 GMT
On Jan 31, 2008 4:44 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'm looking at the problem.
> I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec.
> Try the following:
>
> svn co
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.0
> mvn source:jar javadoc:jar install
>
> The javadoc fails :-( and the source jar does not include the legal files.
> The only way I can think of to include these files is to use the maven
> remote resource plugin.
> See
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.3/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/JavadocJar.java?revision=556389&view=markup
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-source-plugin-2.0.4/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/source/AbstractSourceJarMojo.java?revision=593233&view=markup
>
> They both include resources that are in the
> maven-shared-archive-resources directory, which is the one create by
> the remote resource plugin.
> I have serious doubts that the previous release were done with maven
> (at least for the javadocs and source jars).
>
> Guillaume,
> I'm happy to report that I'm able to build the 1.1 version of
> geronimo-annotation without a problem.
>
> It's with mixed feelings ;-) that I report that I'm also able to build the
> 1.1.1 version of the geronimo-annotation and everything looks good.
>
> What version of maven are you running? I'm running 2.0.7.

Interesting.  I'm using maven 2.0.7.
Maybe the version of the plugins used may impact the result too.

>
> --kevan
>
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 8:40 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Something we overlooked, previously, is
>
> geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.1/src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
>
>
>
> The license/notice file for geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec should contain the w3c
>
> license (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720, I
>
> believe) and an attribution in the notice file.
>
>
>
> Other than the above, all looks good.
>
>
>
> --kevan
>
> Do you think we should cut a new release for this one ?
> Yes. Let me know if you'd like me to take a crack at the license/notice
> file.
>
> --kevan

I'll be in vacation and travelling from monday for two weeks, so unfortunately
my time will be very limited :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Mime
View raw message