geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: 2.1 Release -- Banging the drum
Date Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:42:58 GMT
I'm going to start working on this... looks like there are more  
problems that I thought, though not hard to fix... just a PITA.

--jason


On Jan 20, 2008, at 8:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

>
> On Jan 19, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
>> On Jan 18, 2008 3:15 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Jason. We shouldn't be carrying forward the current  
>>> structure.
>>> And, I think we have enough time to fix this problem while we are  
>>> fixing
>>> other issues with the release.
>>
>> Even though I tend to agree I understand the pain of our end users  
>> who
>> suffer from working with 2.0.2 when we keep telling them use the
>> unofficial 2.1 release and I wish we could release G 2.1 as soon as
>> possible. No issues should be counted any more. Just go ahead,  
>> release
>> and keep working on 2.2 release.
>
> Jacek,
> Let's level-set for a second. From my original note on this subject:
>
> On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> I'd like to set a target of 2 weeks for reviewing and fixing  
>> problems. After that would start the branching, final tck, and  
>> packaging work. If we feel this might negatively impact post-2.1  
>> development activities. We can consider creating a 2.1 branch  
>> sooner...
>
> Are you ok with the 2 week target for reviewing the current trunk  
> codebase and resolving issues?
>
> The structure of our pom's are one of the issues that I think have  
> been identified in our current codebase. Seems like we can resolve  
> the problem within our 2 week timeframe. So, I'm all for fixing the  
> poms...
>
> --kevan


Mime
View raw message