geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Trustin Lee" <trus...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Time to move AsyncHttpClient out of Sandbox
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:16:13 GMT
Well, I think it's OK for the Geronimo team to fork AHC, and I'd like
to respect them if Jeff already gave the information that his AHC work
will be placed under MINA trunk.  They have their release schedule and
I don't want to let them wait for us.  They will need to migrate to
the official MINA AHC eventually though.  Jeff could show us better
road map for this.

Trustin

On Jan 10, 2008 7:55 AM, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 4:57 PM, Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > AsyncWeb and Jeff's AsyncHttpClient are different projects.  Anyways,
> > Jeff is free to modify the trunk, which already contains
> > AsyncHttpClient, whenever he wants.
>
> I know that.
>
> You obviously missed why I posted this information.  The AsyncHttpClient
> code Jeff worked on in his Geronimo sandbox is about to get forked over to
> some other project.  The Geronimo folks are looking for a home for it. I
> wanted people in general to know that Jeff is here working on that stuff.
>
> Makes sense?

Yep, thanks for the information.


On Jan 10, 2008 7:02 AM, Jeff Genender <jgenender@apache.org> wrote:
> Trustin Lee wrote:
> > He made some big changes in
> > Geronimo sandbox before I made some big changes in his original
> > contribution, and that's why it's taking some time.  So.. Jeff will
> > migrate the code to the trunk eventually I guess.
>
> Yes I will ;-) I am swamped at the moment...but I will ;-)

> > On Jan 10, 2008 6:16 AM, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I think Jeff started working on some of it over at MINA btw.  Excuse the
> > > cross post.
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> > > On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in
> > > > it?  Seems like a logical fit.  That said, I think Genender boy wanted
> > > > to melt some metal when he started this work.  If it remains without a
> > > > home I'd put it in components and let folks pick it up if they are
> > > > interested.
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 9, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jan 8, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> #3 is okay with me.  Was just thinking that #2 (plugin) would
allow
> > > > >> us to expose it on our plugin website and allow other users to
just
> > > > >> place a dependency on it in their plugins....
> > > > >
> > > > > Oops. Got distracted and forgot to reply...
> > > > >
> > > > > I was thinking that AHC functionality could be released under
> > > > > components (and thus easier to consume by other projects). We can
> > > > > then create a plugin which includes this component. So, really a
> > > > > combination of 2 and 3.
> > > > >
> > > > > --kevan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Donald
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Kevan Miller wrote:
> > > > >>> On Jan 5, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> > > > >>>> There has been a lot of ongoing work by Jeff, Prasad,
Rick,
> > > > >>>> Sangjin and others on the AsyncHttpClient (aka. AHC)
code in the
> > > > >>>> sandbox and I'd like to start the discussion on moving
it from
> > > > >>>> sandbox into trunk.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> There are a couple options as to where it could reside
-
> > > > >>>> 1) under server/trunk/applications
> > > > >>>> 2) under server/trunk/plugins
> > > > >>>> 3) under geronimo/components/
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> What are everyone's thoughts?  I'd like to get this into
our 2.1
> > > > >>>> release and possibly into the 2.0.x branch if time allows.
> > > > >>> Personally, I don't think it should go into server/trunk.
> > > > >>> There's a 4'th option -- create a subproject (e.g. geronimo/ahc).
> > > > >>> The only real difference,  between this and 3) is web site,
jira,
> > > > >>> etc.
> > > > >>> At the moment, I'm leaning towards 3) -- geronimo/components/ahc
> > > > >>> (or some more descriptive name), but could probably be swayed...
> > > > >>> --kevan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > --
> > http://gleamynode.net/
> > --
> > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> >
>



-- 
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6

Mime
View raw message