geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jarek Gawor" <jga...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Plugin to get stats through JMX or MEJB
Date Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:13:29 GMT
I agree. I think Jeff mentioned this first, for the monitoring client
to support different connectors for getting the stats. So we would
have one connector that talks JMX, another one that uses MEJB, etc.

Jarek

On Jan 2, 2008 4:17 PM, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> I was recently talking to a user that was really interested in the
> modular framework of the server.  They really liked the idea of
> jettisoning the EJB container and were also really interested in
> monitoring the server.  For those folks I'd suspect that JMX is the
> right answer.  Personally, I'd go with JMX and if someone wants to use
> MEJB they should be able to.
>
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Viet Nguyen wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > There was a recent discussion on whether the monitoring plugin should
> > use JMX or MEJB to fetch Geronimo's statistics. Since we want to be
> > able to monitor any type of Geronimo server, including little-G, it is
> > not preferred that we have to pull in OpenEJB in order to monitor that
> > server. Therefore, the JMX method looks like a potential alternative,
> > because I do not think it will need to pull in any additional
> > components.
> >
> > The idea of using JMX and MEJB is the same, and that is, we want to
> > get a hold of the MBeanServer to query that for statistics.
> >
> > The concept of MEJB was defined in JSR-77, which is the only reason I
> > am hesitant to start migrating over to using the JMX method. Should we
> > strictly follow the JSR? or should we branch off and customize a
> > little?
> >
> > Any thoughts or comments?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Viet
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message