geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.1 Release -- Banging the drum
Date Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:44:07 GMT

On Jan 20, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> I'm going to start working on this... looks like there are more  
> problems that I thought, though not hard to fix... just a PITA.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2008, at 8:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 19, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 18, 2008 3:15 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree with Jason. We shouldn't be carrying forward the current  
>>>> structure.
>>>> And, I think we have enough time to fix this problem while we are  
>>>> fixing
>>>> other issues with the release.
>>>
>>> Even though I tend to agree I understand the pain of our end users  
>>> who
>>> suffer from working with 2.0.2 when we keep telling them use the
>>> unofficial 2.1 release and I wish we could release G 2.1 as soon as
>>> possible. No issues should be counted any more. Just go ahead,  
>>> release
>>> and keep working on 2.2 release.
>>
>> Jacek,
>> Let's level-set for a second. From my original note on this subject:
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to set a target of 2 weeks for reviewing and fixing  
>>> problems. After that would start the branching, final tck, and  
>>> packaging work. If we feel this might negatively impact post-2.1  
>>> development activities. We can consider creating a 2.1 branch  
>>> sooner...
>>
>> Are you ok with the 2 week target for reviewing the current trunk  
>> codebase and resolving issues?
>>
>> The structure of our pom's are one of the issues that I think have  
>> been identified in our current codebase. Seems like we can resolve  
>> the problem within our 2 week timeframe. So, I'm all for fixing the  
>> poms...
>>
>> --kevan
>


Mime
View raw message