| Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3679) Montitoring console should display 'available statistics' in a more organized way |
Thu, 06 Dec, 12:56 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3680) The Monitoring agent should optimize DB activity |
Thu, 06 Dec, 13:04 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3680) The Monitoring agent should optimize DB activity |
Thu, 06 Dec, 13:15 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3681) The Monitoring Console should all the type of graph to be chosen |
Thu, 06 Dec, 13:37 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3681) The Monitoring Console should allow the type of graph to be chosen |
Thu, 06 Dec, 13:39 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3682) The Monitoring Console should keep information about Stats available from a managed object |
Thu, 06 Dec, 13:53 |
| Rick McGuire |
[VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 14:43 |
| Davanum Srinivas |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 14:50 |
| David Jencks |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 14:52 |
| Jeff Genender |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 14:52 |
| Rick McGuire |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 14:59 |
| Matt Hogstrom |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 15:02 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 15:07 |
| Joe Bohn |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 15:33 |
| Alan D. Cabrera |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 16:03 |
| Prasad Kashyap |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 16:07 |
| Kevan Miller |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 18:44 |
| David Blevins |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 18:58 |
| Jay D. McHugh |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 19:02 |
| Erik B. Craig |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 19:14 |
| Gianny Damour |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:08 |
| Jason Dillon |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:11 |
| Jacek Laskowski |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Fri, 07 Dec, 08:59 |
| Vamsavardhana Reddy |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Fri, 07 Dec, 09:24 |
| John Sisson |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Fri, 07 Dec, 11:32 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Fri, 07 Dec, 15:55 |
| Aaron Mulder |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Fri, 07 Dec, 15:58 |
| Guillaume Nodet |
Re: [VOTE] Make Yoko core orb a Yoko subproject. |
Mon, 10 Dec, 09:53 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha |
Uninstalling an application |
Thu, 06 Dec, 15:04 |
| Prasad Kashyap |
Re: Uninstalling an application |
Thu, 06 Dec, 15:49 |
| Joe Bohn |
Re: Uninstalling an application |
Thu, 06 Dec, 15:57 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha |
Re: Uninstalling an application |
Thu, 06 Dec, 16:35 |
| Joe Bohn |
Re: Uninstalling an application |
Thu, 06 Dec, 20:39 |
| Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3676) monitoring client throws an error message when there are no graphs present |
Thu, 06 Dec, 15:11 |
| Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3678) Monitoring console should accept a port no for server to be monitored |
Thu, 06 Dec, 16:26 |
| anish pathadan (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3683) Unable to view the installed geronimo plugins |
Thu, 06 Dec, 16:37 |
| Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3678) Monitoring console should accept a port no for server to be monitored |
Thu, 06 Dec, 16:47 |
| Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3679) Montitoring console should display 'available statistics' in a more organized way |
Thu, 06 Dec, 17:29 |
|
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3678) Monitoring console should accept a port no for server to be monitored |
|
| Erik B. Craig (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3678) Monitoring console should accept a port no for server to be monitored |
Thu, 06 Dec, 17:35 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3678) Monitoring console should accept a port no for server to be monitored |
Tue, 11 Dec, 02:48 |
| Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3678) Monitoring console should accept a port no for server to be monitored |
Tue, 11 Dec, 03:24 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3678) Monitoring console should accept a port no for server to be monitored |
Tue, 11 Dec, 13:25 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3678) Monitoring console should accept a port no for server to be monitored |
Mon, 17 Dec, 16:09 |
| Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3678) Monitoring console should accept a port no for server to be monitored |
Thu, 06 Dec, 17:53 |
|
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3617) AsyncHttpClient should support retries on connection failures |
|
| Sangjin Lee (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3617) AsyncHttpClient should support retries on connection failures |
Thu, 06 Dec, 19:14 |
| Sangjin Lee (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3617) AsyncHttpClient should support retries on connection failures |
Mon, 17 Dec, 23:01 |
| Sangjin Lee (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3616) AsyncHttpClient should support a batch invocation method |
Thu, 06 Dec, 19:16 |
| Sangjin Lee (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3615) AsyncHttpClient.sendRequest() should return a future |
Thu, 06 Dec, 19:16 |
| Sangjin Lee (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3616) AsyncHttpClient should support a batch invocation method |
Thu, 06 Dec, 19:16 |
|
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3617) AsyncHttpClient should support retries on connection failures |
|
| Sangjin Lee (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3617) AsyncHttpClient should support retries on connection failures |
Thu, 06 Dec, 19:16 |
| Rick McGuire (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3617) AsyncHttpClient should support retries on connection failures |
Tue, 18 Dec, 16:05 |
| Sangjin Lee (JIRA) |
[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (GERONIMO-3616) AsyncHttpClient should support a batch invocation method |
Thu, 06 Dec, 19:18 |
|
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3615) AsyncHttpClient.sendRequest() should return a future |
|
| Sangjin Lee (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3615) AsyncHttpClient.sendRequest() should return a future |
Thu, 06 Dec, 19:18 |
| Jeff Genender (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3615) AsyncHttpClient.sendRequest() should return a future |
Thu, 06 Dec, 20:13 |
| Sangjin Lee (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3615) AsyncHttpClient.sendRequest() should return a future |
Thu, 06 Dec, 23:06 |
| Jeff Genender (JIRA) |
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3615) AsyncHttpClient.sendRequest() should return a future |
Thu, 06 Dec, 20:30 |
| Jeff Genender (JIRA) |
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3616) AsyncHttpClient should support a batch invocation method |
Thu, 06 Dec, 20:35 |
| Jarek Gawor (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3528) Cannot lookup JNDI context inside some servlet event listeners. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 20:43 |
| Erik B. Craig (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3684) Upgrade Monitoring Client to use Dojo 1.0.1 |
Thu, 06 Dec, 20:45 |
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Assigned: (GSHELL-91) Release plexus-component-annotations |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:21 |
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Created: (GSHELL-91) Release plexus-component-annotations |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:21 |
|
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3528) Cannot lookup JNDI context inside some servlet event listeners. |
|
| Jarek Gawor (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3528) Cannot lookup JNDI context inside some servlet event listeners. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:23 |
| Jarek Gawor (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3528) Cannot lookup JNDI context inside some servlet event listeners. |
Sat, 08 Dec, 17:46 |
| Kan Ogawa (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3528) Cannot lookup JNDI context inside some servlet event listeners. |
Sun, 09 Dec, 01:27 |
| Jarek Gawor (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3528) Cannot lookup JNDI context inside some servlet event listeners. |
Sun, 09 Dec, 02:14 |
| Jarek Gawor (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3528) Cannot lookup JNDI context inside some servlet event listeners. |
Sun, 09 Dec, 02:23 |
| Kan Ogawa (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3528) Cannot lookup JNDI context inside some servlet event listeners. |
Mon, 10 Dec, 02:28 |
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GSHELL-83) Upgrade to plexus-cdc-anno 1.0-alpha-9 |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:37 |
|
[jira] Updated: (GSHELL-91) Upgrade to plexus-component-annotations 1.0-alpha-1 |
|
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GSHELL-91) Upgrade to plexus-component-annotations 1.0-alpha-1 |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:37 |
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GSHELL-91) Upgrade to plexus-component-annotations 1.0-alpha-1 |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:37 |
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Closed: (GSHELL-91) Upgrade to plexus-component-annotations 1.0-alpha-1 |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:39 |
| Jarek Gawor (JIRA) |
[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3528) Cannot lookup JNDI context inside some servlet event listeners. |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:39 |
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Closed: (GSHELL-83) Upgrade to plexus-cdc-anno 1.0-alpha-9 |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:39 |
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Commented: (GSHELL-77) Upgrade Groovy+Maven integreation to 1.0-beta-3 |
Thu, 06 Dec, 21:59 |
| Viet Hung Nguyen (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3679) Montitoring console should display 'available statistics' in a more organized way |
Thu, 06 Dec, 22:33 |
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Closed: (GSHELL-77) Upgrade Groovy+Maven integration to 1.0-beta-3 |
Fri, 07 Dec, 01:07 |
| Jason Dillon (JIRA) |
[jira] Updated: (GSHELL-77) Upgrade Groovy+Maven integration to 1.0-beta-3 |
Fri, 07 Dec, 01:07 |
| pra...@apache.org |
[BUILD] 2.1: Failed for Revision: 601958 |
Fri, 07 Dec, 02:26 |
| Erik B. Craig |
[DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 02:29 |
| Kevan Miller |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 03:35 |
| Erik B. Craig |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 03:55 |
| Kevan Miller |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 03:38 |
| Erik B. Craig |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 04:10 |
| Joe Bohn |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 04:17 |
| Viet Nguyen |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 04:28 |
| David Jencks |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 07:34 |
| John Sisson |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 11:46 |
| Paul McMahan |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 13:56 |
| Joe Bohn |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 19:02 |
| Matt Hogstrom |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Sat, 08 Dec, 04:27 |
| Anita Kulshreshtha |
Re: [DISCUSS] Monitoring Client may need a new graphing engine |
Fri, 07 Dec, 16:55 |