Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27620 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2007 15:20:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2007 15:20:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 47170 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2007 15:20:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46740 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2007 15:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46728 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2007 15:20:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:20:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of c1vamsi1c@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.225] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:19:57 +0000 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id m7so2177464nzf for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:19:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Wr0SoC/efHNHjLMBce5oUXOygpYbRQnE6DRzk2a4SsQ=; b=OZ/52hcLI+3Sn1nkfFe1EKRGN/CKq2zOJAz4tv2iplWFIJilfSirWoxubi+9MUEBqOZuxbYB/CNW8sqgNkAS2ouvMC05ci5lK8A5IKWOKxcBeXmeDDnnTimbIQhX3fRkPBLN/cwQDgCFy9Yr4JAhtzJaG+Q7QB4KW8FTXp69pe4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GMGBqf3RCwdC0KuPjsjVrK5ZdprXtYD9z8f4r166K1iDkdzGZM36rEPOPhvZXvtVfdWB0wwcmqX4mPC7oXkEby6LWBhJtyQUCUCPP5FTjBmLCSXe//+aZVcVP9/K2PcmdLu9ziomFaJo6PGEvIsVT1KXR5eikBOgUxzddNt/WNo= Received: by 10.142.77.11 with SMTP id z11mr246625wfa.1196781598492; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:19:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.213.12 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 07:19:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <22d56c4d0712040719y4f27abe8h6c5c1544147d4f3a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 20:49:58 +0530 From: "Vamsavardhana Reddy" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Deploying to multiple instances of G In-Reply-To: <827366.86141.qm@web31703.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_14800_610361.1196781598474" References: <827366.86141.qm@web31703.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_14800_610361.1196781598474 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Dec 4, 2007 7:36 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote: > Currently when an app is deployed to an instance of G (say A), it > show up as 'stopped' in other instances. IIRC the relevant config.xml > had load=false for this config. There shouldn't be any entry for this app in config.xml in the other instances of the server. Atleast it does not get added at deployment time. Even if it gets added with load="false", it does not result in a server startup failure whether or not the app is uninstalled from the server instance it is originally installed. If the app is deleted from A and all > the servers are shutdown. The other servers can not be started > (NoSuchConfigException) because the config (app) has been removed from > the repository. What should be the correct behavior? If the app is installed from instance A and uninstalled from instance B then instance A is in trouble. I raised this concern a while ago and David Jencks said it is expected. As long as the app is installed and uninstalled from the same server instance, it should not (and does not currently) affect other instances. > > > Thanks > Anita > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > ------=_Part_14800_610361.1196781598474 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On Dec 4, 2007 7:36 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha <a_kulshre@yahoo.com> wrote:
  Currently when an app is deployed to an instance of G (say A), it
show up as 'stopped' in other instances. IIRC the relevant config.xml
had load=false for this config.
There shouldn't be any entry for this app in config.xml in the other instances of the server.  Atleast it does not get added at deployment time.  Even if it gets added with load="false", it does not result in a server startup failure whether or not the app is uninstalled from the server instance it is originally installed.

If the app is deleted from A and all
the servers are shutdown. The other servers can not be started
(NoSuchConfigException) because the config (app) has been removed from
the repository. What should be the correct behavior?
If the app is installed from instance A and uninstalled from instance B then instance A is in trouble.  I raised this concern a while ago and David Jencks said it is expected.  As long as the app is installed and uninstalled from the same server instance, it should not (and does not currently) affect other instances.

 


Thanks
Anita


     ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

------=_Part_14800_610361.1196781598474--