geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to make the Yoko ORB a subproject of Geronimo.
Date Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:45:16 GMT
I agree and would support adding Yoko as a subproject and adding the 3 
new committers.

-Donald

Kevan Miller wrote:
> 
> On Dec 3, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> 
>> Below is a proposal that Matt Hogstrom, one of the mentors of the Yoko 
>> project, has put forward for moving on with the Yoko project.  In a 
>> nutshell, the Yoko community has basically decided there is not a lot 
>> of continuing interesting in moving this project forward.  This 
>> decision does have a major impact on Geronimo, as Geronimo uses the 
>> Yoko ORB was a key element to allow Geronimo 1.2 to support both the 
>> 1.4 and 1.5 JVMs, and also was a necessary element for achieving j2ee5 
>> certification.  The Yoko ORB gives Geronimo cross JVM portability 
>> which was not available before.  At the current time, there's probably 
>> no suitable replacement that has all of the advantages that the Yoko 
>> ORB provides.
>> In a nutshell, Matt's proposal is for the core ORB elements of the 
>> Yoko project become a subproject of the Geronimo project.  These are 
>> the pieces of Yoko that Geronimo has a dependency upon.  These are 
>> essentially the org.omg.* clases, the javax.rmi.* classes, plus the 
>> implementation classes backing those spec interfaces.  Along with the 
>> subproject, there are 6 committers who have expressed interest in 
>> continuing to work on the core ORB code.  3 of the interested 
>> commiters are already Geronimo committers.  Matt's proposal would 
>> grant the remaining 3 Geronimo committer status as well.
>>
>> There's one important caveat in assuming owership of this package.  
>> The core ORB is also used by the Harmony project to add CORBA and RMI 
>> support to the Harmony JVM.  Included with assuming ownership of the 
>> package would be a commitment to keep the core ORB a "standalone" 
>> component.  This means not adding direct dependencies on Geronimo and 
>> keeping dependencies on other packages to a minimum.
>> This code is fairly stable now, and has already passed certification 
>> on multiple JVM instances, so I don't expect there will be a lot of 
>> overhead in supporting this.  The bulk of the recent work to get this 
>> to pass certification have been done by Geronimo committers, so 
>> Geronimo is probably the most appropriate new home for this code.
>> Anyway, this needs to have some discussion and be put to a vote.  
>> Below is the proposal that Matt posted to the Yoko dev mailing list 
>> about this move.  The Yoko community seems very much in agreement that 
>> project does not have sufficient momentum to graduate from the incubator.
> 
> Thanks for the summary, Rick.
> 
> I'm certainly interested in seeing support for Yoko move forward. This 
> seems like a positive move. It would have my support.
> 
> After a brief review of the Yoko dev list archives and based on Matt's, 
> and Alan's recommendations, I would support adding Lars, Alexey, and 
> Darren to as Geronimo committers.
> 
> Keeping Yoko as a standalone component is an easy decision, IMO. Hard to 
> see it any other way...
> 
> --kevan
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message