geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Our 2.1 assemblies are nearly 2x the size of 2.0.2
Date Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:16:46 GMT
Damn gshell...WTF?

:-)

I couldn't resist ;-)

Jeff

Jason Dillon wrote:
> No doubt some increase is from the gshell libs. We can probably optimize them a little
and use repository references and such...
> 
> --jason
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Bruce Snyder" <bruce.snyder@gmail.com>
> 
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 14:52:44 
> To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Our 2.1 assemblies are nearly 2x the size of 2.0.2
> 
> 
> On Nov 30, 2007 3:59 PM, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> It looks like the size of our images is increasing dramatically (nearly 2x).
>>
>> For example, the geronimo-jetty6-minimal snapshots have been growing
>> like this (these image sizes are from the snapshot repo):
>>
>> 16604006 Jul 26 18:54
>> geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20070726.182538-1-bin.tar.gz
>> 17086729 Jul 26 18:53 geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20070726.182538-1-bin.zip
>>
>> 22310769 Nov  1 03:19
>> geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20071101.014839-2-bin.tar.gz
>> 22744083 Nov  1 03:18 geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20071101.014839-2-bin.zip
>>
>> 30812531 Nov 30 22:45
>> geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20071130.211933-3-bin.tar.gz
>> 31248864 Nov 30 22:43 geronimo-jetty6-minimal-2.1-20071130.211933-3-bin.zip
>>
>>
>> The javaee5 images have also grown significantly.
>>
>> 57099671 Jul 26 18:39 geronimo-jetty6-jee5-2.1-20070726.182538-1-bin.tar.gz
>> 58685668 Jul 26 18:36 geronimo-jetty6-jee5-2.1-20070726.182538-1-bin.zip
>>
>> 55113050 Nov  1 03:28
>> geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-20071101.014839-1-bin.tar.gz
>> 56827820 Nov  1 03:25 geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-20071101.014839-1-bin.zip
>>
>> 71313050 Nov 30 22:54
>> geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-20071130.211933-2-bin.tar.gz
>> 73094816 Nov 30 22:50 geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-2.1-20071130.211933-2-bin.zip
>>
>>
>> I haven't looked into the cause yet ... but does anybody have some ideas
>> on the culprit?
> 
> FWIW, we've experienced the same thing with ServiceMix. I think it
> might be a problem with Maven and how it's resolving and including
> transitive dependencies.
> 
> Bruce

Mime
View raw message