Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=RMpeDQj5bu5sO+oUGZLXMyHtTvcTwEauuFiWgli7uR7ISePIy28bs0IG7WJXDDFdPguEal81TCOyrZ/ID0A4h1+Wqce1+J3OfydxoZzY8W3dfdJhCeQuMYWOCu0IeO3brc/XFv6BgTTAzS/jyUMUioTDQW8nNpcrXoeYV+M/j6o=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <4730ED20.7080107@earthlink.net>
References: <944538E5-2382-4263-8126-5405B711CFE4@yahoo.com>
 <4730ED20.7080107@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <E4368828-7A56-4005-81BB-A7CB54816CF8@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Should we move the framework assembly into framework?
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:59:18 -0800
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org


On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:

>
>
> David Jencks wrote:
>> Moving the boilerplate and framework assembly into framework might  
>> make it simpler to see how to construct custom servers and check  
>> that the framework assembly only has what it should inside.
>> Thoughts?
>
> I'm ok with it in either location.
>
> If it is moved then it would be valuable if we could modify the  
> build to automatically include everything under configs in the  
> assembly.  That way there would be no doubt that it included  
> exactly what should be in framework.

That might not be appropriate.  In fact I think we should trim the  
framework assembly further by removing the geronimo-gbean-deployer  
config.  _Maybe_ we can assemble all the configs in framwork with the  
bootstrap gbean deployer..... in which case maybe your idea would  
work.  I think the most important thing about the framework assembly  
is to keep it small :-)

thanks
david jencks

>
> Joe