From dev-return-56540-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org Tue Nov 06 22:57:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51320 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2007 22:57:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2007 22:57:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 73058 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2007 22:57:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 72980 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2007 22:57:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 72969 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2007 22:57:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:57:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.95.66] (HELO smtp103.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.95.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:58:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 14584 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2007 22:57:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=SfLwTNwPttBNx/GsaaTE13DnKd1k8jFmayZTYtw2xqyGDg+2oASwk2ULDcpjTdVy1BGdWMwUqmXAjvjPjwvmJYMPGzPC0dJbBI/zQxjbXX+Q+LgWCi9D0lusgpsAK8pK+BF2YUNLxRFvGS3qCPr8jeZu2OE9jZs+9vqi1sAuTLY= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.103?) (david_jencks@67.102.173.8 with plain) by smtp103.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2007 22:57:00 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 26clJUUVM1ntkjAPCqtlpAEY9xVM5rgP_1RGcZ4j2qeQwXCTihBQ9BA28AJd0tl8AHArmltlOA-- Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <5eb405c70711061432x193521c6o6c5e136a2a95976c@mail.gmail.com> References: <944538E5-2382-4263-8126-5405B711CFE4@yahoo.com> <5eb405c70711061432x193521c6o6c5e136a2a95976c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <8D52C155-185A-47ED-B204-C81C226CC3AD@yahoo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Jencks Subject: Re: Should we move the framework assembly into framework? Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:56:43 -0800 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > +1. Also, what about "geronimo-boilerplate-javaee5"? Can we remove > that or change things around so it is useful? thanks for the reminder, it's gone david jencks > > Jarek > > On 11/6/07, David Jencks wrote: >> Moving the boilerplate and framework assembly into framework might >> make it simpler to see how to construct custom servers and check that >> the framework assembly only has what it should inside. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> thanks >> david jencks >>