geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kashyap" <goyathlay.geron...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we move the framework assembly into framework?
Date Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:56:20 GMT
Just FYI -,

The framework/modules/geronimo-j2ee is just one artifact that
does/should not be included in the framework-assembly.

This artifact is needed to build c-m-p. So it builds along with the
other modules in framework. It's need there is seen the greatest in a
bootstrap build.

Cheers
Prasad

On 11/6/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > David Jencks wrote:
> >> Moving the boilerplate and framework assembly into framework might
> >> make it simpler to see how to construct custom servers and check
> >> that the framework assembly only has what it should inside.
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > I'm ok with it in either location.
> >
> > If it is moved then it would be valuable if we could modify the
> > build to automatically include everything under configs in the
> > assembly.  That way there would be no doubt that it included
> > exactly what should be in framework.
>
> That might not be appropriate.  In fact I think we should trim the
> framework assembly further by removing the geronimo-gbean-deployer
> config.  _Maybe_ we can assemble all the configs in framwork with the
> bootstrap gbean deployer..... in which case maybe your idea would
> work.  I think the most important thing about the framework assembly
> is to keep it small :-)
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> >
> > Joe
>
>

Mime
View raw message