geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hernan Cunico <hcun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.1 Release
Date Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:27:44 GMT
Hey Dave,
for some reason my reply never went out. 

This is great, let's keep it here on GMOxDEV while you still working on it and then we'll
see how to include/move over the 2.1 doc.

Cheers!
Hernan

David Jencks wrote:
> I started a page on new plugin stuff over here... 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Plugin+Guide
> (next time maybe I'll look at where you want it :-( )
> 
> I can't figure out how to get ${foo} to display without confluence 
> thinking its a macro so any help there would be great.
> 
> Please feel free to move this to wherever it will fit best and comment 
> on all the stuff I left out :-)
> 
> thanks
> david jencks
> 
> 
> On Nov 8, 2007, at 1:17 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
> 
>> Hey y'all,
>> I started to map some of the new features/functions to the 2.1 
>> documentation.
>>
>> I just created a new wiki space http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21
>> and created some initial entries. Pls chime in with your ideas for 
>> topics to cover but don't stop just there,
>> feel free to start working out some content too if you feel compelled 
>> to do so ;-)
>>
>> Help with the documentation is GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!
>>
>> I will be starting a separate thread on user@ for user feedback as well.
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan
>>
>> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>>> Agreed, we seem to have enough new stuff to call for a release.
>>> Here is a list trying to consolidate these new functions/improvements
>>> - GShell
>>> - Console enhancements (dep plan generation, grouping/collapsing?)
>>> - Monitoring
>>> - Plugin infrastructure
>>> - Pluggable console
>>> - Security
>>> - Configuration (config.xml, config-subst, etc)
>>> - Deployment plans
>>> - Tooling
>>> - ...?
>>> We will also need a whole new set of documentation to cover these in 
>>> GMOxDOC21.
>>> Anybody in desperate need for contributing docs for these features? 
>>> ;-) it will be very much appreciated.
>>> Cheers!
>>> Hernan
>>> Kevan Miller wrote:
>>>> I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release.
>>>>
>>>> There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin 
>>>> infrastructure. There's also been the pluggable console 
>>>> enhancements. It would be good to get a release out, with these 
>>>> capabilities. They provide a more solid platform for future 
>>>> enhancements, I think.
>>>>
>>>> There's also GShell and new monitoring capabilities. I'm probably 
>>>> missing a few other new functions.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, IIUC, 2.1 would be able to support a Terracotta plugin. I'd 
>>>> also be very interested to hear what WADI capabilities that could be 
>>>> exposed.
>>>>
>>>> I'm willing to bang the release manager drum. I see that Joe has 
>>>> already started tugging on the TCK chain
>>>>
>>>> What do others think? How close are we to a 2.1 release? What 
>>>> additional capabilities and bug fixes are needed? Can we wrap up 
>>>> development activities in the next week or two?
>>>>
>>>> --kevan
>>>>
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message