geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Release J2G 1.0.0 RC1
Date Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:22:31 GMT
No, the reorg was for post 1.0.0 discussion.

The whole idea, is to get J2G out there as-is and get some real-world 
user feedback on it....


-Donald


Lin Sun wrote:
> The .project and .classpath files are used when the plugins are loaded
> in Eclipse IDE.    You are right they don't have ASL license headers
> but I don't see license headers associated with these files normally.
>  The files in the geronimo eclipse plugin don't have ASL license
> headers either.   Also, these files are not in the assembly.
> 
> I am not sure what we need to do with jboss here.   Of course we are
> using it since it is a migration tool from jboss to geronimo.  Any
> advice here?
> 
> About the recent discussion, I don't remember anyone mentioned any
> action plans in any schedule, so I assume that is not an item for this
> 1.0 release.
> 
> Lin
> On Nov 6, 2007 4:20 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What are they .project and .classpath files? They don't have ASL license
>> headers...
>>
>> I assume JBoss is a trademarked name. We are using it in some file names and
>> in some file contents. Are we handling this correctly? I don't know the
>> answer off hand.
>>
>> There was a recent discussion about aggregating migration tools in a common
>> devtools directory. Was there a consensus reached?
>>
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/2/07, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Starting discussion thread for Vote thread at -
>>>    http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-J2G-1.0.0-RC1-tf4740253s134.html
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message