geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3641) NamedUPCredentialLoginModule vs ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule
Date Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:16:50 GMT


Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3641.

    Resolution: Invalid

> NamedUPCredentialLoginModule vs ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: GERONIMO-3641
>                 URL:
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> I see that ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule and NamedUPCredentialLoginModule
are added to geronimo codebase around the same time (rev 159325 and rev 159560).  The difference
between the two is that NamedUPCredentialLoginModule uses the user supplied username and password
where as ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule gets the username and password
from options supplied to the login module.  NamedUPCredentialLoginModule is used by the Security
realms portlet whereas there are no references to ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule
in the codebase.  I guess one of them (most likely ConfiguredIdentityNamedUsernamePasswordLoginModule)
is redundant and it should be eliminated.  What am I missing?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message