Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jgawor@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.229 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=LXeFXBOMqxYyHQnlPD+J2fUD6aJBQvfdAr29wUaBKnhgEgjZuW2pfeUTnNBHHx/x7WT9Zc6AwMsqI7UT5uShKsXkjAqVhmDVg8kvPOlZujVdcljhQvtZm+63aOP67efp9Yf86rUWZEK1cLR33R4Jk1AzaMsQpHAbGJ4/CYQgsI4=
Message-ID: <5eb405c70710291112n263448f8je2752da9ac4c5f89@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:12:57 -0400
From: "Jarek Gawor" <jgawor@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, erik.craig@gmail.com
Subject: Re: deploying snapshots of the samples to a new location in
 m2-snapshot-repo
In-Reply-To: <472605BD.2020108@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <6EF740C3-EA49-4E65-A5BF-80A828C5FC6A@gmail.com>
	 <4723422E.2070002@apache.org>
	 <5eb405c70710272211r3ed26417lbc166d4ab6c5cd7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4724E175.5010407@apache.org>
	 <B1E25643-B451-42C6-B559-422327ADBA92@gmail.com>
	 <5eb405c70710290743y54c7d9afx8b4ff8d0a4f99980@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c278ac970710290900n6611d209r3ccf03611a72bbb0@mail.gmail.com>
	 <472605BD.2020108@gmail.com>

Binary files in wiki and source in svn? That works for me.

Jarek

On 10/29/07, Erik B. Craig <ginemesis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Prasad,
> I have put some thought into this myself and agree with you. It would be
> too much of a hassle for users, I think, if they have to download
> subversion and maven along with the sample app, and THEN compile it
> before attempting to deploy it. Probably the best thing would be to have
> 'releases' or snapshots of the sample apps up on the wiki, along with
> the source being in the subversion repo.
>
>
> -Erik
>
> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> > While a part of me seems to agree with you that we should remove the
> > zip file from the samples' wiki pages, a greater part of me feels that
> > we may be forcing some our users to now get SVN.
> >
> > A user who just downloads and installs from a binary server will have
> > no need for svn. But just to get to the samples, he now has to get
> > SVN.
> >
> > Then he has to get maven to play with the samples. So we are making
> > him jump thro' many hoops just to see our prized samples.
> >
> > Hmm..
> >
> > Cheers
> > Prasad
> >
> > On 10/29/07, Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/29/07, Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> One other question -- should we try to have parity between what's in
> >>> samples/trunk and what's in the samples section of the wiki?  Are
> >>> there barriers, technical or otherwise, that make this difficult?
> >>>
> >>>    http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSAMPLES/index.html
> >>>    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/trunk/
> >>>
> >> Yes, definitely. That was the goal for 2.0 samples at least. The wiki
> >> documentation should be up to date (expect the artifact version) and
> >> all the code in wiki should be in the samples svn. If anything, I
> >> would like to remove the attached sample .zip files from the wiki and
> >> instead direct the users to checkout the sample code from svn.
> >>
> >> Also, I think we should release samples at the same time (or close to)
> >> when we release Geronimo.
> >>
> >> Jarek
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>