Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85902 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2007 02:49:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2007 02:49:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 27393 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2007 02:49:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 27341 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2007 02:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 27330 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2007 02:49:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:49:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of linsun.unc@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.224] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:49:40 +0000 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so22805wxd for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:49:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qK7D2awuhnHJJc/kUG+x1jMrSvKYKTV3GnXZXRuwpGs=; b=DyXUpH7/uIJEsEAOPjFi2dc8A/542lmpQ+o5xAx/VkOZLkpln7+1EX0eh6EaU7pEKPg1yzpHdj6ekYbBoATfllmQtWUVqLcVTMqzAgAuij76VLh34YAn0TXgGAfVA9fRwB29z+xA8S2k3c4xCacT20COhJzYq4LeY9nbLQLWtJg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Hbvn9/u2C1sC51kDqnUhFk2sOldIJz/LIxkxRJfHKE036uZZ12kT22HhIDu4IcTPHS3E7Rc2WYjB7h3kRsQDqSt7oLMWACZp8r5LTLbHdhLtpC4X2XJPjlhq55jgUAvhaskK7FDBUe0qV4GSXlGme3+KiqPBfAObqFMOxD8fEEM= Received: by 10.70.33.8 with SMTP id g8mr107047wxg.1192675758632; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.104? ( [66.57.117.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i35sm458433wxd.2007.10.17.19.49.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4716C9AA.8000604@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:49:14 -0400 From: Lin Sun User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discuss] Remaining work items before we create a J2G 1.0.0 branch? References: <470EDF27.8010607@yahoo.com> <73a75e430710121055v4a96c562v1e364e17dbaf5bb2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Kevan, I've marked G3309 as resolved. I documented my analysis in the latest few comments I added in the JIRA. If there is anything else that is missing from a legal point of view, please let me know. Thanks, Lin Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Jason Warner wrote: > >> Donald, >> >> I'm still unsure of the status of the license files for J2G. If we >> can get a confirmation that those are ok, then I'm all for releasing a >> 1.0.0. Otherwise, I think we should hold off. > > Right. They aren't ok. And must be fixed before j2g can be released. I > had problems building and haven't gotten back to it... > > There's a jira (GERONIMO-3309) with 2 patches that are supposed to fix. > If somebody can have a look, that'd be great... > > --kevan >