Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cjblythe25@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.166.181 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=tZVbxvbhQYcDaTbhHpz6M3kOse9s27yeHA8XXZycInhtrtnP+3YLzKT7AmwNZh+L+bMfxuJ2kj0dVMah/s14Qm/Vp40ajkhcixv26uilmwE93sy7MDx0VQ/yEE3Fd4coldr0+R22RjS1z4ChoHeJM4IvIN7arC+IRu/I0e79g6E=
Message-ID: <421012bd0710230811t2ad329ecsb8cef79d3627d54c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:11:30 -0400
From: "Christopher Blythe" <cjblythe25@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Draft of 2.0.2 Performance Report
In-Reply-To: <dba733960710230753m6396a1eficc7fc4e2330cbf89@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_919_11782010.1193152290326"
References: <393AD735-8148-47BA-BFA2-1AC335D543D3@hogstrom.org>
	 <dba733960710230753m6396a1eficc7fc4e2330cbf89@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_919_11782010.1193152290326
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

ah... piyush raises a good point regarding the session 2 direct mode. this
is provided by both daytrader 1.2 and 2.0 and is one of the more common
patterns we see out in the j2ee community.

chris

On 10/23/07, Piyush Agarwal <pvagarwal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.
>
> Here is my feedback on it-
>
>    - Run spellcheck :-p there were a few typos here and there like
>    "enough" spelled "ebnough"
>    - The Introduction on page 3 takes about PT, that was a metric you
>    used in the last report, but in this report you are comparing against
>    G1.1.1. The PT is not being used or mentioned throughout the
>    remaining of the report.
>    - Please mention if you need RAIDs or Ramdisks for the DB
>    - I think you forgot the mention the OS version... I assume its SLES
>    "10" SP1
>    - Quite surprised that we go from 70M unzipped to 111M after initial
>    startup (whats the big hitter here.. the logs??)
>    - The URL at the end of page 8 (more info about daytrader) seems to
>    be incorrect and the link doesnt match the URL
>    - the slowdown in the web primitives is a bit surprising... and yet
>    the jump in direct mode numbers is pretty cool
>    - would have loved to see the Trade Session2JDBC numbers as well
>    - pg 14, 2nd para, typo "due" --> "do"
>    - can we have an appendix at the end of the report with individual
>    run results like last time?
>
> HTH,
> Piyush Agarwal
>
> On 10/22/07, Matt Hogstrom < matt@hogstrom.org > wrote:
> >
> > I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y'all a
> > gander at what I have for the performance report at this point.  This
> > is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0.  There are a few numbers
> > that are missing.  I originally had planned on not producing them but
> > the charts look odd with the missing numbers.  It includes a
> > comparison of 1.1.1 and 2.0.2 using DayTrader 1.2 and 2.0.  Heh, we
> > need to release those monsters.
> >
> > This should be considered an alpha release but will move quickly to
> > final by the end of the week :)
> >
> > Please provide your feedback on content, what's interesting, not, etc.
> >
> > Thanks for taking a few minutes to look at the draft.
> >
> > Look at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/>
> > Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
>


-- 
"I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets
evolve, let the chips fall where they may." - Tyler Durden

------=_Part_919_11782010.1193152290326
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

ah... piyush raises a good point regarding the session 2 direct mode. this is provided by both daytrader 1.2 and 2.0 and is one of the more common patterns we see out in the j2ee community.<br><br>chris<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">
On 10/23/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Piyush Agarwal</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:pvagarwal@gmail.com">pvagarwal@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Matt, <br><br>This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.<br><br>Here is my feedback on it-<br><ul><li>Run spellcheck :-p there were a few typos here and there like &quot;enough&quot; spelled &quot;ebnough&quot;
</li><li>The Introduction on page 3 takes about PT, that was a metric you used in the last report, but in this report you are comparing against G1.1.1. The PT is not being used or mentioned throughout the remaining of the report.
</li><li>Please mention if you need RAIDs or Ramdisks for the DB</li><li>I think you forgot the mention the OS version... I assume its SLES &quot;10&quot; SP1</li><li>Quite surprised that we go from 70M unzipped to 111M after initial startup (whats the big hitter here.. the logs??)
</li><li>The URL at the end of page 8 (more info about daytrader) seems to be incorrect and the link doesnt match the URL</li><li>the slowdown in the web primitives is a bit surprising... and yet the jump in direct mode numbers is pretty cool
</li><li>would have loved to see the Trade Session2JDBC numbers as well</li><li>pg 14, 2nd para, typo &quot;due&quot; --&gt; &quot;do&quot;</li><li>can we have an appendix at the end of the report with individual run results like last time?
<br></li></ul>HTH,<br><span class="sg">Piyush Agarwal<br><br></span><div><span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/22/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matt Hogstrom</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:matt@hogstrom.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">

matt@hogstrom.org
</a>&gt; wrote:</span></span><div><span class="e" id="q_115cd5b837ec9885_4"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I&#39;ve been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y&#39;all a
<br>gander at what I have for the performance report at this point.&nbsp;&nbsp;This<br>is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0.&nbsp;&nbsp;There are a few numbers<br>that are missing.&nbsp;&nbsp;I originally had planned on not producing them but<br>

the charts look odd with the missing numbers.&nbsp;&nbsp;It includes a
<br>comparison of 1.1.1 and 2.0.2 using DayTrader 1.2 and 2.0.&nbsp;&nbsp;Heh, we<br>need to release those monsters.<br><br>This should be considered an alpha release but will move quickly to<br>final by the end of the week :)<br>

<br>
Please provide your feedback on content, what&#39;s interesting, not, etc.<br><br>Thanks for taking a few minutes to look at the draft.<br><br>Look at <a href="http://people.apache.org/%7Ehogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">


http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/</a><br>Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf<br><br>Thanks<br></blockquote></span></div></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>&quot;I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets evolve, let the chips fall where they may.&quot; - Tyler Durden

------=_Part_919_11782010.1193152290326--