geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <>
Subject Re: Draft of 2.0.2 Performance Report
Date Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:02:24 GMT

On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:

> Hi Matt,
> This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.
> Here is my feedback on it-
> Run spellcheck :-p there were a few typos here and there like  
> "enough" spelled "ebnough"
what is a spell checker ?
> The Introduction on page 3 takes about PT, that was a metric you  
> used in the last report, but in this report you are comparing  
> against G1.1.1. The PT is not being used or mentioned throughout  
> the remaining of the report.
thanks for catching this.  PT is left over from the initial report.   
I'll fix that.

> Please mention if you need RAIDs or Ramdisks for the DB

> I think you forgot the mention the OS version... I assume its SLES  
> "10" SP1
Page 9
> Quite surprised that we go from 70M unzipped to 111M after initial  
> startup (whats the big hitter here.. the logs??)

> The URL at the end of page 8 (more info about daytrader) seems to  
> be incorrect and the link doesnt match the URL
> the slowdown in the web primitives is a bit surprising... and yet  
> the jump in direct mode numbers is pretty cool
The mysteries of life ... it wierded me out as well.  I think it  
needs to be looked into but it is an external measurement so I figure  
putting out the info as it is with all the caveats is better than  
waiting another 6 months :)
> would have loved to see the Trade Session2JDBC numbers as well
could due that
> pg 14, 2nd para, typo "due" --> "do"
> can we have an appendix at the end of the report with individual  
> run results like last time?
Maybe...I have the XML files from JIBE but there doesn't seem to be a  
way to regerenate a nice you know how to do this ?
> HTH,
> Piyush Agarwal
> On 10/22/07, Matt Hogstrom < > wrote:
> I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y'all a
> gander at what I have for the performance report at this point.  This
> is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0.  There are a few numbers
> that are missing.  I originally had planned on not producing them but
> the charts look odd with the missing numbers.  It includes a
> comparison of 1.1.1 and 2.0.2 using DayTrader 1.2 and 2.0.  Heh, we
> need to release those monsters.
> This should be considered an alpha release but will move quickly to
> final by the end of the week :)
> Please provide your feedback on content, what's interesting, not, etc.
> Thanks for taking a few minutes to look at the draft.
> Look at
> Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf
> Thanks

View raw message