geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <>
Subject Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Date Fri, 05 Oct 2007 02:55:59 GMT

We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA.  Dain  
provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3  
and EJB 2.x.  At this point you can achieve the desired results using  
the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration.  I'd be interested in helping  
you out on this.  Do you have a current set of DDs your working from  
or are these the same ones as we had back in 

On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:

> Hi,
> Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
> maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
> Both seem to be available at
> When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
> flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
> successfuly running on Geronimo - SjAS requires a support of
> READ_COMMITTED and REPEATABLE_READ transaction isolation levels in XA
> mode, and TranQL 1.3 only supports READ_UNCOMMITTED level. Issue
> GERONIMO-2128 <>  is
> related to this issue, and it's still open.
> At that time Matt Hostrom said he has plans to add the necessary  
> support
> in TranQL 1.3.1 or 1.4, but as I can see, G2.0.1 still uses TranQL  
> 1.3:
> Matt, could you, or anyone else, please shed some light on the current
> situation with this issue?
> Thank you very much!
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD
> ---
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
> Registered legal address: 125252, Moscow, Russian Federation,
> Chapayevsky Per, 14.
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

View raw message