geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <>
Subject Re: [Discuss] Remaining work items before we create a J2G 1.0.0 branch?
Date Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:15:49 GMT

On Oct 17, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Lin Sun wrote:

> Hi Kevan, I've marked G3309 as resolved.  I documented my analysis  
> in the latest few comments I added in the JIRA.  If there is  
> anything else that is missing from a legal point of view, please  
> let me know.

Hi Lin,
That's great. Thanks for working on this. A few comments:

1. Artifacts that are AL2 licensed can still be mentioned in the  
license file. Although not necessary, it's good for completeness.  
Just say the following are licensed under ALv2: commons-logging, etc.

2. I think the NOTICE file needs a bit more attention. Even though  
projects are ALv2 licensed, we need to reproduce their NOTICE  
attributions as appropriate. Also, our notice file should mention  
dom4j, pull-parser, and jaxen and reproduce the copyrights that are  
in their licenses. The pull-parser license requires the following  

     "This product includes software developed by the Indiana
      University Extreme! Lab.  For further information please visit"

The appropriate location for this acknowledgement is the NOTICE file.

I'll look a bit more...


View raw message