geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: J2G future positioning
Date Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:11:58 GMT
I like a generic "Migrator" package name under devtools, so it leaves 
open the possibility for other app servers to Geronimo and to 
upgrade/migrate from previous Geronimo releases if we make major changes.

-Donald

Kevan Miller wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/29/07, *Tim McConnell* <tim.mcconne@gmail.com 
> <mailto:tim.mcconne@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi, Does anyone have any thoughts as to how we'll position the J2G
>     plugin in the
>     future ?? I understand now that in its initial iteration that it is
>     narrowly
>     scoped to work for JBoss specific migrations only (thus the JBoss in
>     the name).
>     However, it seems if we want to eventually enhance it as a more
>     generic tool for
>     migrating multiple applications to Geronimo (which I would hope we
>     would), it
>     might be a good time now to reconsider a more generic and/or
>     appropriate name.
>     Any thoughts ??
> 
> 
> I think it's a good idea to call it a "migration tool". We definitely 
> should not be using the name "JBoss". j2g would be ok (though i'd be in 
> favor of a generic name).
> 
> --kevan

Mime
View raw message