geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Hogstrom <m...@hogstrom.org>
Subject Re: Draft of 2.0.2 Performance Report
Date Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:23:47 GMT
Thanks.  Amazing what you can read when you know the answer.

On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> Page 9 mentions -
> SO F T WA R E
> Operating System:
> SuSE Enterprise Linux Enterprise SP1
> 2.6.16.46-0.4-smp #1 SMP Mon Apr 2 17:59:08 UTC
> 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> The OS version is missing "SuSE Enterprise Linux Enterprise 10 SP1"
>
> As for JIBE, If you have the .log files which go with the xml files  
> its easy as they have the complete JIBE output captured verbatim  
> which you can copy paste in the report. I dont know any automated  
> way of getting the numbers from the XML... seems it does summarize  
> the run at the end of then file under the <HTTP_summary> tag.
>
>
> On 10/23/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:
>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.
>>
>> Here is my feedback on it-
>> Run spellcheck :-p there were a few typos here and there like  
>> "enough" spelled "ebnough"
> what is a spell checker ?
>>
>> The Introduction on page 3 takes about PT, that was a metric you  
>> used in the last report, but in this report you are comparing  
>> against G1.1.1. The PT is not being used or mentioned throughout  
>> the remaining of the report.
> thanks for catching this.  PT is left over from the initial  
> report.  I'll fix that.
>
>>
>> Please mention if you need RAIDs or Ramdisks for the DB
> K
>
>> I think you forgot the mention the OS version... I assume its SLES  
>> "10" SP1
> Page 9
>> Quite surprised that we go from 70M unzipped to 111M after initial  
>> startup (whats the big hitter here.. the logs??)
>
>>
>> The URL at the end of page 8 (more info about daytrader) seems to  
>> be incorrect and the link doesnt match the URL
>> the slowdown in the web primitives is a bit surprising... and yet  
>> the jump in direct mode numbers is pretty cool
> The mysteries of life ... it wierded me out as well.  I think it  
> needs to be looked into but it is an external measurement so I  
> figure putting out the info as it is with all the caveats is better  
> than waiting another 6 months :)
>>
>> would have loved to see the Trade Session2JDBC numbers as well
> could due that
>> pg 14, 2nd para, typo "due" --> "do"
> doh
>> can we have an appendix at the end of the report with individual  
>> run results like last time?
> Maybe...I have the XML files from JIBE but there doesn't seem to be  
> a way to regerenate a nice summary...do you know how to do this ?
>>
>> HTH,
>> Piyush Agarwal
>>
>> On 10/22/07, Matt Hogstrom < matt@hogstrom.org > wrote:
>> I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y'all a
>> gander at what I have for the performance report at this point.  This
>> is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0.  There are a few numbers
>> that are missing.  I originally had planned on not producing them but
>> the charts look odd with the missing numbers.  It includes a
>> comparison of 1.1.1 and 2.0.2 using DayTrader 1.2 and 2.0.  Heh, we
>> need to release those monsters.
>>
>> This should be considered an alpha release but will move quickly to
>> final by the end of the week :)
>>
>> Please provide your feedback on content, what's interesting, not,  
>> etc.
>>
>> Thanks for taking a few minutes to look at the draft.
>>
>> Look at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/
>> Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message