geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christopher Blythe" <cjblyth...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Draft of 2.0.2 Performance Report
Date Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:11:30 GMT
ah... piyush raises a good point regarding the session 2 direct mode. this
is provided by both daytrader 1.2 and 2.0 and is one of the more common
patterns we see out in the j2ee community.

chris

On 10/23/07, Piyush Agarwal <pvagarwal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.
>
> Here is my feedback on it-
>
>    - Run spellcheck :-p there were a few typos here and there like
>    "enough" spelled "ebnough"
>    - The Introduction on page 3 takes about PT, that was a metric you
>    used in the last report, but in this report you are comparing against
>    G1.1.1. The PT is not being used or mentioned throughout the
>    remaining of the report.
>    - Please mention if you need RAIDs or Ramdisks for the DB
>    - I think you forgot the mention the OS version... I assume its SLES
>    "10" SP1
>    - Quite surprised that we go from 70M unzipped to 111M after initial
>    startup (whats the big hitter here.. the logs??)
>    - The URL at the end of page 8 (more info about daytrader) seems to
>    be incorrect and the link doesnt match the URL
>    - the slowdown in the web primitives is a bit surprising... and yet
>    the jump in direct mode numbers is pretty cool
>    - would have loved to see the Trade Session2JDBC numbers as well
>    - pg 14, 2nd para, typo "due" --> "do"
>    - can we have an appendix at the end of the report with individual
>    run results like last time?
>
> HTH,
> Piyush Agarwal
>
> On 10/22/07, Matt Hogstrom < matt@hogstrom.org > wrote:
> >
> > I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y'all a
> > gander at what I have for the performance report at this point.  This
> > is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0.  There are a few numbers
> > that are missing.  I originally had planned on not producing them but
> > the charts look odd with the missing numbers.  It includes a
> > comparison of 1.1.1 and 2.0.2 using DayTrader 1.2 and 2.0.  Heh, we
> > need to release those monsters.
> >
> > This should be considered an alpha release but will move quickly to
> > final by the end of the week :)
> >
> > Please provide your feedback on content, what's interesting, not, etc.
> >
> > Thanks for taking a few minutes to look at the draft.
> >
> > Look at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehogstrom/performance/geronimo/2.0/>
> > Geronimo2.0.2PerformanceReport-v01draft.pdf
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
>


-- 
"I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets
evolve, let the chips fall where they may." - Tyler Durden

Mime
View raw message