Actually, I'm suggesting we pull the web services out of DayTrader all
together and write another web services sample app. If DayTrader is truly
meant to be a "performance benchmark", why would you leave something in
there that is in clear violation of performance best practices. Doesn't
exactly send the right message if you ask me.
On 10/2/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
>
> > Matt...
> >
> >
> > In summary, I guess I really just wanted to say that I feel the web
> > services modes in DayTrader should be removed at least until we can
> > come up with something better. If the only reason to keep these
> > around is to provide a "sample" and not a performance benchmark,
> > lets come up with some other sample that demonstrates web services.
> >
>
> You make a good point about the WebServices. I'd suggest that we
> document the current limitations of comparing these WebServices in
> performance benchmarks. That should help to set everyone's
> expectations about the relevant usefulness of the data.
>
> For WebServices it sounds like your suggesting that we deprecate web
> services for performance work rather than for functional purposes
> like was done for the MDB primitives. I'd be for adding the warning
> in a readme.
>
>
--
"I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets
evolve, let the chips fall where they may." - Tyler Durden
|