Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4134 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2007 14:50:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2007 14:50:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 57066 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2007 14:50:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 56806 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2007 14:50:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 56795 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2007 14:50:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:50:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.178] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:50:41 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so714934wah for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:50:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=cuUYGsC8XUC2vGZawyZE3CuUx70iz/wwJ7BoYk1QmYc=; b=Vo7bJJYL2+3p12LwVwFriM/YtsTyqmB5thYsuS8qloUR78Zt5Yw0QRlhNEdJuOmIF5dwZmLLyHZ4ttps0qu3YUir1u9r+DKcYyoyVnu4g1OxaEcf4GXJEXHPXt9pEr7bnbesF4YloQWaBjgrT0w0JOOaQtlosP/mN5Osnh5q70s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=j47UIEIjyLCbnRWEzTskfjuzbOUvBC6LQx+WYui/9i7OK4dloOzD6ZwGuuKLGiIM813M8PILc2NZQ+dJd5PtdqVVEwUURWZBKCVjPQPTRI3VYOLnEq3xA/8SPBTv6x3F8nO5qk2KbS4/li2fJj1gSQjvKByCVyFCSWNNyUHR/HA= Received: by 10.114.88.1 with SMTP id l1mr2214469wab.1190299820828; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.39.7 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:50:20 -0400 From: "Prasad Kashyap" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: automatic builds with tests In-Reply-To: <7A18AC59-E84B-4E40-A5C7-3841336AE1B3@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5eb405c70709141343v445dde80pbc22482290286c94@mail.gmail.com> <719870CA-BA71-415D-9EBB-9855D94DCEA0@gmail.com> <7A18AC59-E84B-4E40-A5C7-3841336AE1B3@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Right. We have talked about this before and the majority opinion was to have a separate subject line. I have a gmail reader, but then again it's not about how I want it. I'll gladly put whatever the majority of the community decides. Start a [VOTE] thread :-)) Cheers Prasad On 9/19/07, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > > OK. I have enabled the unit tests to run on all builds for both trees > > (2.0 and trunk). > > > > The testsuite presently runs only with all 2.0 builds. I'm soon going > > to enable it to run on all trunk builds too. > > > > Now that all tests are running, there will be only 4 builds a day - 4 > > am, 10 am, 4 pm and 10 pm. > > Great. > > Seems like we talked about this, before... I wish your emails would > have non-mutable Subjects. Rather than including the Revision number > or number of tests passed/failed, just indicate success or failure. > Details are in the body of the mail, already... > > For example: > > [BUILD] Trunk: Successful for Revision: 577451 > [BUILD] 2.0: Failed for Revision: 577231 > > Since the revision number is always changing, each of those emails > will be a separate Subject thread. > > [BUILD] Trunk: Successful > [BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed > > These emails would be sorted into the same discussion thread as > previous notifications... > > I don't know about your mail reader, but this would really reduce the > amount of real estate your notifications take up. Also, much easier > for me to delete ;-) > > --kevan > > > >