Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates
 209.85.128.188 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=ME8qeaNE/qgi083i/osPNa/gGvSiBj33oPtUohPZuzssnks1Eezho1qmqlowhEZP4U5theOWnQ8SIuTO2Wl0k5J9PUTg/iEvkL+otznD/obBY3asWGVFxVbaOmTiFxr4cnKymm/Lp6d5yuuV9Anw5CMRTWRizNiniuwiEwCDkug=
Message-ID: <b23ecedc0709210633n364cd4ddm1bc8b8347ed3126a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:33:28 +0200
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gnodet@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: OSGifying org.apache.geronimo.specs
In-Reply-To: <487a994c0709210629n4f3c14e8vd61235e19bf31a40@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <b23ecedc0709201540v2c49c025n4b01d4dcd10946e1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b23ecedc0709210617h68ed5212pfffed52005517dbb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <487a994c0709210629n4f3c14e8vd61235e19bf31a40@mail.gmail.com>

Well, I previously used an OSGified bundle of stax-api that only
contained java.xml.stream packages.  The geronimo one contains other
classes in javax.xml* packages, so I've first tried to export all
these packages from the bundle.  When I did that, I end up with the
following exception in my test:
  Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/xml/stream/XMLStreamException

I've just changed the directive to export only javax.xml.stream*
packages in the geronimo jar and it worked well.  I have no clear
explanation for that yet though ...

On 9/21/07, Karl Pauls <karlpauls@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So I've just commited a patch for everybody to review.
> > I have tested some of the bundles inside servicemix 4.0, so at least
> > i'm confident it won't break servicemix ;-)
> > Seriously, they seem to be ok, though i had to limit the exported
> > package from stax-api to javax.xml.stream* to not clash with other
> > packages from the system bundle (I suppose this is the reason).
>
> Can you maybe elaborate a little bit on what you mean by clash? In
> case you are talking about what gets embedded and what not there is
> the -split-package directive that you can use to select which provider
> you want to use or how to merge split-packages.
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
>
> > See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/
> >
> > On 9/21/07, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > For ServiceMix 4.0, which will be based on OSGi, I will need to have
> > > OSGified versions of some of the spec jars that geronimo provides.
> > > It's quite easy to do in ServiceMix (see
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/branches/servicemix-4.0/bundles/
> > > for servlet, j2ee-management, jms mainly), but I think it would be
> > > more useful for other projects if the specs jars were bundles
> > > themselves.
> > >
> > > This is quite a simple process that can be done incrementally without
> > > any real side effect and low risk of regression.  So unless someone
> > > objects, I'd like to start working on that.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > ------------------------
> > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpauls@gmail.com
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/