Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72645 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2007 13:30:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2007 13:30:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 87816 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 13:30:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 87761 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 13:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 87750 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2007 13:30:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:30:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of karlpauls@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.172] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:30:09 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so576134ugc for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:29:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=eMi+EO4HBQtK8j2Ik2wIW2jjCk2LkjPja7wxX3TNlYk=; b=oO4lYawGxzGwjkmFT2BMRuA1JdnSbXuJKlPqLKi7EKju1R+zou+7nK1IwwBc2MEAGpL36sTAjq9AwfDCfsdMRjvthzO6px4ePHFuUlTkaIW9UnV7Ii/9GerGyOc/FVtRBezT32Y3uy7FpS902ChEBd0HFtJqHiJzMS0t1OwbTHs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PNUc2Qosl9mkjuNxI6mUL8qJhYzMeQnY0F7hhw+aSV2o8ceUmnWyioFtJvhy5wMFVORoUQwUn73F3humt0VBTM0DmbvTQRdSLDvMD5Yymal5IkIX23ir/orOEdULReQ5wBpu43M9oJEp2dsr2Gy3t68R9V1xIFZPh7AfCvPdH80= Received: by 10.78.146.11 with SMTP id t11mr2030047hud.1190381387085; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.136.1 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <487a994c0709210629n4f3c14e8vd61235e19bf31a40@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:29:47 +0200 From: "Karl Pauls" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: OSGifying org.apache.geronimo.specs In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 9/21/07, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > So I've just commited a patch for everybody to review. > I have tested some of the bundles inside servicemix 4.0, so at least > i'm confident it won't break servicemix ;-) > Seriously, they seem to be ok, though i had to limit the exported > package from stax-api to javax.xml.stream* to not clash with other > packages from the system bundle (I suppose this is the reason). Can you maybe elaborate a little bit on what you mean by clash? In case you are talking about what gets embedded and what not there is the -split-package directive that you can use to select which provider you want to use or how to merge split-packages. regards, Karl > See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/ > > On 9/21/07, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > For ServiceMix 4.0, which will be based on OSGi, I will need to have > > OSGified versions of some of the spec jars that geronimo provides. > > It's quite easy to do in ServiceMix (see > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/branches/servicemix-4.0/bundles/ > > for servlet, j2ee-management, jms mainly), but I think it would be > > more useful for other projects if the specs jars were bundles > > themselves. > > > > This is quite a simple process that can be done incrementally without > > any real side effect and low risk of regression. So unless someone > > objects, I'd like to start working on that. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > ------------------------ > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > -- Karl Pauls karlpauls@gmail.com