Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29306 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2007 11:54:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2007 11:54:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2684 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 11:54:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 2616 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 11:54:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 2574 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2007 11:54:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:54:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paulmcmahan@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.231 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.231] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:54:07 +0000 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so586219wxd for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:53:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=BMUqL9YtLgzpnff3Ywn53UwU770n7iGq1GBowGE+yJo=; b=TDbg2B4J9gfiYozPmXu4sd7Yl3QWZB3ZhIKRyl/JlHHkcOT0BqOQqbVUsquqdGb4WIKFgTUQvohMlaMpkqp8f5z/JOs8Uss+6occlRKRDNJF5HrAE9KHKQrKUQcf7XeHH0AovDbqi4eggSifTfGRIZLCwe2l20SvychuQSwRuk4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=o0pvIRgCJvUBHje0k/P1r/g8AMpZi4t/fvNuuf8AwYyO1RFflUFPF0tLsgX+trwqDEepdPHVhif8kAzLtoAd3zmSlX4WWXIk08xMxWqtbETlrnjaKAqKx2RbYwL+z7nik+ZuYIRyJ0ugFf00ltpSnodBZ8Fs+GD64wslDh+REUE= Received: by 10.100.112.19 with SMTP id k19mr5886354anc.1190375626105; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:53:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.100? ( [65.5.198.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm461128hsx.2007.09.21.04.53.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <30391EBA-C6AD-42BD-83AF-FCC72908F1AB@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Paul McMahan Subject: Re: OSGifying org.apache.geronimo.specs Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:53:48 -0400 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Sep 20, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > For ServiceMix 4.0, which will be based on OSGi, I will need to have > OSGified versions of some of the spec jars that geronimo provides. > It's quite easy to do in ServiceMix (see > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/branches/ > servicemix-4.0/bundles/ > for servlet, j2ee-management, jms mainly), but I think it would be > more useful for other projects if the specs jars were bundles > themselves. > > This is quite a simple process that can be done incrementally without > any real side effect and low risk of regression. So unless someone > objects, I'd like to start working on that. > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/