Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75263 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2007 13:36:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2007 13:36:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 5209 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 13:36:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5156 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2007 13:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5145 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2007 13:36:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:36:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:38:16 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDDE714219 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <22725255.1190381751377.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:35:51 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3481) Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use In-Reply-To: <11141509.1190266273974.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3481: ------------------------------------------ Attachment: GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch addressed this issue. I can not explain how or why it works. With the patch, I have deployed a security realm and an ejb app using offline deployer without hitting port any port conflicts. Can someone explain how this is workiing? Here is how I arrived at the patch: 1. I noticed that offline deployer is calling applyOverrides() on AttributeManager( based on var/config/jsr88-configurer-config.xml) where as I will expect it to call the method on ServerAttributeManager(based on var/config/config.xml) 2. With 1 in mind, I changed line 138 in KernelConfigurationManager to use configurationList instead of attributeStore. This will not break the server as configurationList and attributeStore are the same for it. But this resulted in test failures. 3. I reverted 2 and changed the online-deployer plan file so that ConfigurationManager->AttributeStore uses ServerAttributeManager and ConfigurationManager->PersistentConfigurationList uses AttributeManager. With this change, the deployer ran fine but did not update config.xml 4. I finally resorted to using ServerAttributeManager for both AttributeStore and PersistentConfigurationList in online-deployer plan. I thought it would compute all the configurations in config.xml as the configs to be started. When I check in the debugger, it is computing only those five configs in jsr88-configurer-config.xml as the configs to be started when the offline deployer is invoked. MainConfigurationBootstrapper is using the AttibuteManager from online-deployer config to get the persistent configurations though AttributeManager is not connected with ConfigurationManager. Note: By offline deployer, I am referring to invoking deploy.bat with "--offline" option > Offline deployer throws BIND Exception when port 1099 is in use > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-3481 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3481 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: deployment > Affects Versions: 2.0.1, 2.0.x, 2.1 > Environment: G 2.0.1 - Running multiple instances > Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy > Assignee: David Jencks > Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.0.x, 2.1 > > Attachments: GERONIMO-3481-1.patch, GERONIMO-3481-weird.patch > > > Offline deployer throws Bind Exception when port 1099 is in use. Here is a scenario steps in which the problem is experienced. > 1. Extract G-2.0.1-Tomcat distro to C:\ > 2. Create a dir "myserver" under C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1 and copy C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\var to C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var (all sub-directories). > 3. Edit C:\geronimo-j2ee-tomcat-2.0.1\myserver\var\config-substitutions.properties to set PortOffset=10. > 4. Open a command window and start Geronimo. Since org.apache.geronimo.server.name is not set, this will start the default server instance. > 5. Open a second command window, set GERONIMO_OPTS=-Dorg.apache.geronimo.server.name=myserver. This will be command window to run the second server instance with name "myserver" > 6. Run deploy.bat --offline list-modules. > At step 6, I am getting a BIND Exception since port 1099 is in use (by the default server instance) and the offline deployer is attempting to start rmi naming on port 1099. Since, this deploy command is run against second server instance, I would expect that it uses the configuration properties of "myserver" in which case it should use port 1109 to start rmi-naming if at all there is a need. When port 1099 is not in use, the offline deployer works as expected by updating proper config.xml file when a configuration is deployed/undeployed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.