geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Warner" <jaw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Adding j2g to site
Date Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:17:22 GMT
On 9/25/07, Tim McConnell <tim.mcconne@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Erik, Jason and Viet, Today I've updated the "Apache Geronimo
> Development
> Tools Subproject" website (below) to include the latest information about
> the
> new release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin.
>
> ---> http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html



Excellent.  I'll take a look and let you know if there are any issues.

I've also included some information about the J2G Migration tool from some
> of
> the notes in this thread. Since I don't know a lot about this new tool,
> I'm
> hoping you all might review what I have thus far to see if it's kinda what
> you
> all had envisioned. Also, every Sunday I push out the latest trunk build
> of the
> Geronimo Eclipse plugin to our unstable site (below). I've assumed it's
> okay to
> do the same for the J2G plugin as well and have listed it in the downloads
> sections.
>
> ---> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/



That's not just okay, it's fantastic.   Thanks for doing that.

Regards,

Jason Warner

Thanks
>
>
> Erik B. Craig wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable
> > from within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved
> > logging/information output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of
> > interest out in the general open source community in moving applications
> > from Jboss to Geronimo (such as today's inquiry on theserverside.com
> > <http://theserverside.com>), I feel as though it would be of some
> > benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our confluence wiki (
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html) linked
> > somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking either as it's
> > own link under 'Subprojects', much as Development Tools, GBuild, or
> > XBean are situated, or as an addition inside the Development Tools page,
> > much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there.
> >
> > I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional writing (beyond what
> > is on the wiki) if it were to be under it's own section, or a subsection
> > of development tools if necessary, but I think it would be good to get
> > it up and out there sooner rather than later, especially to coincide
> > with the recent release of 2.0.1 to perhaps show those out there
> > remotely interested in migrating, there are tools available to assist
> > and perhaps 'hold their hand' a bit.
> >
> >
> > Thoughts? Comments? Objections?
> >
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Erik B. Craig
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Tim McConnell
>

Mime
View raw message