geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: Schema issues
Date Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:57:21 GMT

On Sep 7, 2007, at 4:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:

> On Sep 7, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>> I was collecting the different schema files used by Geronimo to
>> publish them on a web site and I noticed one thing with the
>> plugins-1.2 xsd. First, it imports attributes-1.1.xsd and not
>> attributes-1.2.xsd. And that's fine. That's what 2.0.1 came out with.
>> But in trunk the plugins-1.2.xsd was updated to import
>> attributes-1.2.xsd. I don't think that is right as it will break
>> compatibility. I think we should create plugins-1.3.xsd (with -1.3
>> namespace) which then can import the attributes-1.2.xsd (and switch
>> the plugins-1.2.xsd to the version in branches/2.0).
> I guess I didn't notice that 2.0.1 was going out with something  
> called plugins-1.2 when I started working on GERONIMO-3330 which  
> also included a rather different plugins-1.2.  I'll see about  
> renaming the file in trunk to plugins-1.3 although it might take me  
> a few days.

I think I fixed this... hopefully without breaking everything.

david jencks

>> I also validated the rest of the .xsd files and for the most part  
>> they
>> validate ok. A few of them ( geronimo-web-2.0.xsd,
>> geronimo-jetty-2.0.xsd, and geronimo-tomcat-2.0.xsd) import
>> persistence-1.0.xsd as a local file. I can't find that file anywhere
>> in Geronimo. Should I update these Geronimo .xsd files to refer to
>> or should
>> we pull it in locally?
> I'm not sure what you mean by "refer to..." but either one is fine  
> with me as long as I don't have to deal with any questions about  
> whether CDDL licensed source files can be in apache svn.  It looks  
> like the current draft of the 3rd party licensing policy would  
> allow us to include a cddl licensed persistence_1_0.xsd:
> redirected from
> thanks
> david jencks
>> Jarek

View raw message