geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Genender <jgenen...@apache.org>
Subject Re: New GShell-based Geronimo Server launcher now in server/trunk
Date Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:40:24 GMT
Yeah...I need Tomcat for this plugin I am working on..thanks.

Jeff

Jason Dillon wrote:
> Ya, should be simple enough... though I don't want to keep maintaining
> these extra assemblies, I'd like to just convert all of the assemblies
> to use this stuff...
> 
> But if it helps ya out, I can make a geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-gshell...
> 
> --jason
> 
> 
> On Sep 8, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> 
>> Is this working for the Tomcat assembly?  If not...can it soon?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jeff
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A little bit more insight into what I'm thinking of doing... since
>>> some of you can't read minds to well :-P
>>>
>>> I'd like to convert all of the assemblies to basically look like what
>>> the assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell produces.
>>>
>>> And then I'd like to start converting the other cli bits to gshell
>>> command impls, like: deployer, client and shutdown.
>>>
>>> And then (maybe around the same time or before the above), I'd like
>>> to adapt the gshell of target jvm bits to load jars from the
>>> repository, instead of using the lib/* bits.
>>>
>>> A little background for those who haven't looked at
>>> assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell and what it produces from a
>>> lib/* perspective.  Right now I've set up the assembly to produce:
>>>
>>>    geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib
>>>    geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/boot
>>>    geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/endorsed
>>>    geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/gshell
>>>
>>> Where the bits in lib/* and lib/endorsed/* are the same as they were
>>> before.  The bits in lib/boot/* and lib/gshell/* are specific to
>>> gshell.  And normally a gshell installation would have everything I
>>> put into lib/gshell/* into lib/*, but I moved them to a sub dir for
>>> now... since the bin/*.jar's load jars from the ../lib/* dirs.
>>>
>>> The lib/boot/* stuff is the very minimal gshell bootstrap classes,
>>> which setup up the other happiness... and let you do things like:
>>>
>>>    java -jar
>>> ./geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/boot/gshell-bootstrap.jar
>>>
>>>
>>> And that will give you a nice shell... or
>>>
>>>    java -jar
>>> ./geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/boot/gshell-bootstrap.jar
>>> start-server
>>>
>>> That will launch the G server process using all of the right
>>> -Djava.ext.dirs and whatever properties that we currently have hacked
>>> into platform scripts.
>>>
>>> Anyways, so the idea is to move all of the bits which are current in
>>> the lib/* into the repository, and then configure the gshell command
>>> impl to load put the correct dependency artifacts onto the classpath
>>> of the target jvm that is booted up.  This will augment the existing
>>> kernel bootstrap from repo stuff, putting evertying except what is
>>> needed from gshell into the repository...
>>>
>>> And really, what I'd like to eventually get to is having the
>>> bootstrap from the repository... so that everything except for what
>>> is now it lib/boot/* and lib/endorsed/* can live in the repository
>>> like happy little communistic jars should be :-P
>>>
>>> * * *
>>>
>>> And then there are longer term things for GShell...
>>>
>>> Remote administration (via, telnet, ssh, or custom ssl protocol...
>>> last is most likely to actually happen soonish)
>>>
>>> Process management, which is great for clusters, or staging ->
>>> production management.  A full suite of command-line tools which can
>>> manage the configuration of a server... easily.  So, for example,
>>> lets say you've got a configuration that is working really well for
>>> you... but you want to play with something new...
>>>
>>> So you might:
>>>
>>>    ./bin/gsh backup-configuration before-mucking
>>>    ./bin/gsh start-server
>>>
>>> And then go and change a whole bunch of stuff...  and it doesn't
>>> work... yikes... so rollback...
>>>
>>>    ./bin/gsh backup-configuration hosed-server
>>>    ./bin/gsh restore-configuration before-mucking
>>>    ./bin/gsh start-server
>>>
>>> And then maybe you want to play with the "hosed-server" configuration
>>> again...
>>>
>>>    ./bin/gsh start-server --configuration hosed-server
>>>
>>> Of course, all of these could have been run from a single ./bin/gsh,
>>> but just for clarity, you can run them one off too.
>>>
>>> Maybe list or mange the configurations
>>>
>>>    ./bin/gsh list-configurations
>>>    ./bin/gsh remove-configuration some-unwanted-config
>>>    ./bin/gsh copy-configuration default some-new-config
>>>
>>> The sky is the limit really... for what kind of management we can do...
>>>
>>> Lets say you wanted to do the above on a remote node?
>>>
>>>    ./bin/gsh remote-shell someserver:9443
>>>    Connecting to someserver:9447...
>>>    Connected
>>>
>>>    username: system
>>>    password: **** (remember this is all jline, so we can mask
>>> passwords like one woudl expect)
>>>
>>>    someserver:9447 > list-configurations
>>>    someserver:9447 > remove-configuration some-unwanted-config
>>>    someserver:9447 > copy-configuration default some-new-config
>>>
>>> So, all of these operations would happen on the node named
>>> "someserver" listening on 9443 (over ssl of course).  Or how about
>>> you want to reboot a server remotely?
>>>
>>>    someserver:9447 > restart-server now
>>>    Geronimo server shutting down...
>>>    ....
>>>    Geronimo server shutdown.
>>>    Geronimo server starting...
>>>    ...
>>>    Geronimo server started in ...
>>>
>>> Since GShell manages the processes its really easy to perform a full
>>> restart of a Server w/o needing magical platform scripting muck.  And
>>> it will just work the same on each platform too.
>>>
>>> Once we have clustering, then we can do the same kinda thing for an
>>> entire cluster of nodes...
>>>
>>>    someserver:9447 > restart-cluster now
>>>    Shutting down 2 nodes...
>>>    <node1> Geronimo server shutting down...
>>>    <node1>....
>>>    <node2> Geronimo server shutting down...
>>>    <node2>....
>>>    <node1>Geronimo server shutdown.
>>>    <node2>Geronimo server shutdown.
>>>    Starting up 2 nodes...
>>>    <node1>Geronimo server starting...
>>>    <node1>..
>>>    <node2>Geronimo server starting...
>>>    <node2>..
>>>    <node1>Geronimo server started in ...
>>>    <node2>Geronimo server started in ...
>>>    Started up 2 nodes.
>>>
>>> And well, if you had some kinda script file which controlled say a
>>> logical grouping of nodes you could easily invoke that script (ya
>>> even on a remote system) and it will go and do it:
>>>
>>> someserver:9447 > script -l groovy
>>> local:file://restart-universe.groovy qa-universe
>>>
>>> The local: bit of the uri siginals the local URL handler to be used,
>>> which will cause the file://restart-universe.groovy to be loaded from
>>> the gsh instance where you are actually logged into (and ran the
>>> remote-shell gshell command) and will pipe its contents securely to
>>> the remote shell running on someserver:9447 and pass it to the script
>>> command to execute.
>>>
>>> The restart-universe.groovy might look something like this:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>> import universe.Lookup
>>>
>>> assert args.size == 1 : 'Missing universe name'
>>>
>>> def universe = args[0]
>>>
>>> // Look up a list of nodes (for now say they are basically
>>> hostname:port)
>>> def nodes = Lookup.lookup(universe)
>>>
>>> log.info("Stopping universe ${universe}...")
>>> nodes.each { host ->
>>>    shell.execute("remove-shell $host stop-server")
>>> }
>>> log.info("Universe ${universe} stopped")
>>>
>>> log.info("Starting universe ${universe}...")
>>> nodes.each { host ->
>>>    shell.execute("remove-shell $host start-server")
>>> }
>>> log.info("Universe ${universe} started")
>>> </snip>
>>>
>>> Its kinda crude script, but I think you get the general point...
>>>
>>> * * *
>>>
>>> Anyways... I see... well, *HUGE* potential for this stuff...
>>>
>>> And really, a lot of what I just described above isn't that far into
>>> fantasy, its all relatively easy to implement on top of GShell... as
>>> it is now (or really as it was a year+ ago when I wrote it).  Its
>>> really a matter of do others see the same value... and do others see
>>> the vision of using GShell as the core process launcher to allow
>>> things like "restart-server", or a "stop-server; copy-configuration
>>> default known-good; copy-configuration default testing;
>>> start-server", or that uber-fancy remote-shell muck.
>>>
>>> So, I'm gonna give y'all a few days to grok (or try to) what I've
>>> just spit out... please ask questions or comment, as I like to know
>>> I'm not just talking to myself here.
>>>
>>> And then maybe later next week, we might vote or come to some other
>>> consensus that this is the right direction for Geronimo, and well...
>>> then I'll make it become reality.
>>>
>>> Aighty, and now I'll shut up :-P
>>>
>>> --jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aighty, well... I've done some long awaited re-factoring, and while
>>>> its still not _perfect_ its a whole lot better now IMO  I think from
>>>> a framework perspective that its probably mature enough to take on
>>>> the task of being the server bootloader.
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to continue to refactor the guts of GShell over time, of
>>>> course... but I think that what is there now is highly usable for a
>>>> simple platform independent launcher, as well as for porting over
>>>> the other cli bits we have.
>>>>
>>>> I've done a lot of work in the past week, incase you didn't see the
>>>> storm of scm messages... pulled out pico, plopped in plexus, pulled
>>>> out commons-logging and commons-lang, which are suck and boated (in
>>>> that order).  I've gotten the basic framework and supported classes
>>>> to use GShell down to ~ 1mb (a wee bit under)... though when I
>>>> started to add the layout.xml abstraction stuff, I had to pull in
>>>> xstream which bloated her back up to ~1.4m.  I may eventually fix
>>>> that... or not, cause xstream is soooo very handy for xml -> object
>>>> stuff.
>>>>
>>>> I've fallen in love with annotations... they are *ucking great. 
>>>> They work really well for handling the cli option and argument muck
>>>> which most every command needs to do.  And striping out the
>>>> insano-sucking commons-cli really simplified command implementations
>>>> dramatically IMO.
>>>>
>>>> Anyways... I've make a heck of a lot of progress on cleaning up the
>>>> GShell framework... and more is to come I'm sure...  But for now, I
>>>> think its probably ready for use primetime as the Geronimo Server's
>>>> bootloader.
>>>>
>>>> I think this provides a some significant value...
>>>>
>>>> 1) Platform scripts become consistent and relatively simple, easy to
>>>> maintain
>>>>
>>>> 2) Everyone will now have a consist way of launching the server,
>>>> even if you like a .sh, .bat, or java -jar, then end process that is
>>>> launched will be the same for everyone.
>>>>
>>>> 3) Opens up the door for some really nice and fancy fancy management
>>>> muck (like restarting the server from the web console, or cloning a
>>>> server instance or backing up a server instance...)
>>>>
>>>> 4) Lays the ground work for future features, like cluster
>>>> management, remote administration and scripting...
>>>>
>>>> * * *
>>>>
>>>> So, I think its time to decide... are we a go or no go for GShell as
>>>> the core CLI for Geronimo thingys and even more important, are we go
>>>> or no go for using GShell to boot up the server process?
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>>

Mime
View raw message