geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ted Kirby" <ted.ki...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Default server log level
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:11:22 GMT
I very much favor and endorse changing the file logging level to INFO.

Ted Kirby

On 9/11/07, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:
> I agree, that changing the file logging level to INFO is more usable for the
> majority of our users.
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
> > The intent of this thread is to discuss the default log level for the
> > Geronimo server. I'd like to limit the discussion to the near-term (e.g.
> > Geronimo 2.0.x). IMO, we need a good overhaul of our logging code. I'd
> > like to see more structure and consistency in our logging. However,
> > that's not a 2.0.x issue.
> >
> > The current default log level for a Geronimo 2.0.1 server is ERROR. IMO,
> > this is too restrictive. I think we should set the default to INFO. This
> > will make our server logging more verbose. However, I'd rather have too
> > much information, rather than too little.
> >
> > I think our default target audience should be application developers and
> > new users evaluating Geronimo. Currently, these users are forced to
> > configure log levels to INFO, so that they can obtain necessary
> > information for building and deploying applications on Geronimo. This
> > information should be available by default, not requiring configuration...
> >
> > Users who want to limit the logging output can reconfigure the default
> > logging levels, once they are more comfortable with Geronimo.
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > --kevan
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message