geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <c1vams...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?
Date Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:43:20 GMT
Will we have a released version of MyFaces 1.2.1?  I believe we do not want
to include any SNAPSHOT versions as dependencies in our releases.

Vamsi

On 9/21/07, Paul McMahan <paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After thinking about this some more I upgraded the MyFaces version to
> 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT in server/trunk but not in the 2.0 branch.  If trunk
> is passing all JSF tests in time for 2.0.2 then I will upgrade there
> as well.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
>
> > On Sep 17, 2007, at 1:49 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> >> Paul McMahan wrote:
> >>> Joe, you mentioned TCK and our ability to make 2.0.2 available by
> >>> 9/21.  I have a question for the team about that.   I would like
> >>> to bump Geronimo's version of MyFaces from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 since
> >>> that new release contains several bug fixes, some of them
> >>> actually found and reported by Geronimo users.  But doing that
> >>> could affect Geronimo's TCK results and affect the 9/21 delivery
> >>> date.   I would imagine that the same is true for other
> >>> dependencies.    Are we OK with picking up maintenance releases
> >>> of Geronimo dependencies in 2.0.2 even if we think TCK issues
> >>> could slow us down?   Or should we keep 2.0.2 focused on
> >>> "localized" changes and only bump the dependency versions in
> >>> Geronimo 2.1 so we have more time to deal any resulting TCK issues?
> >>
> >> I think it makes sense to move to the latest version of the
> >> Geronimo dependencies.  However, it probably makes sense to
> >> validate areas in the TCK that may be impacted prior to the change
> >> or soon there-after in case there are issues that need to be
> >> resolve which might impact our ability to deliver in a timely manner.
> >
> > OK thanks Joe (and Kevan).   Just wanted to make sure that overall
> > as a team we agree that it's OK to introduce changes that could
> > affect the proposed 9/21 date due to TCK issues.   We can always
> > back those changes out if we decide to, of course.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Paul
>
>

Mime
View raw message