geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul McMahan <>
Subject Re: What exactly is going into 2.0.2?
Date Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:18:57 GMT
After thinking about this some more I upgraded the MyFaces version to  
1.2.1-SNAPSHOT in server/trunk but not in the 2.0 branch.  If trunk  
is passing all JSF tests in time for 2.0.2 then I will upgrade there  
as well.

Best wishes,

On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:

> On Sep 17, 2007, at 1:49 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>> Paul McMahan wrote:
>>> Joe, you mentioned TCK and our ability to make 2.0.2 available by  
>>> 9/21.  I have a question for the team about that.   I would like  
>>> to bump Geronimo's version of MyFaces from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 since  
>>> that new release contains several bug fixes, some of them  
>>> actually found and reported by Geronimo users.  But doing that  
>>> could affect Geronimo's TCK results and affect the 9/21 delivery  
>>> date.   I would imagine that the same is true for other  
>>> dependencies.    Are we OK with picking up maintenance releases  
>>> of Geronimo dependencies in 2.0.2 even if we think TCK issues  
>>> could slow us down?   Or should we keep 2.0.2 focused on  
>>> "localized" changes and only bump the dependency versions in  
>>> Geronimo 2.1 so we have more time to deal any resulting TCK issues?
>> I think it makes sense to move to the latest version of the  
>> Geronimo dependencies.  However, it probably makes sense to  
>> validate areas in the TCK that may be impacted prior to the change  
>> or soon there-after in case there are issues that need to be  
>> resolve which might impact our ability to deliver in a timely manner.
> OK thanks Joe (and Kevan).   Just wanted to make sure that overall  
> as a team we agree that it's OK to introduce changes that could  
> affect the proposed 9/21 date due to TCK issues.   We can always  
> back those changes out if we decide to, of course.
> Best wishes,
> Paul

View raw message