Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94149 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2007 13:16:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2007 13:16:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 24494 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2007 13:16:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 24437 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2007 13:16:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 24426 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2007 13:16:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:16:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.233 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.233] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:16:28 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 57so477441wri for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:16:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=ie/3fBGVN7IAjXJPZkfBRMVZzROvw8W0Uss+XOa1qmk8jp3l5TJYxmr2syBg2Nxy+gUoL1Jk5aZpua3X+BaChNcnr1pwxsDEaQJ7HrxoZXHbXxeTdXoVobkt/F14Qa7GdGTSvfPagsvqO2x9u5/YYri/NF3H4WQJYsfrwvGp+3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer; b=dbc6Nv7mOG6wwhCdguNJwlsI9p/G7j6A1hR0oCNNrSh6SRd/5GzTmMN4Zr6BiD7oZFTXqYrEk3u4mKnIq5P9j4sWPQhnes76M81ej5M+JQVHOri6ehItBe63CutkzZrUUn1XuMXMHA9mvJVY3qAl0epn+QyLlOLUoqJGxGR1gJY= Received: by 10.90.35.15 with SMTP id i15mr4551192agi.1186406167897; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.101? ( [69.134.127.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm7648350agb.2007.08.06.06.16.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <78E7724A-D853-42C7-8410-FE02B80B9C0E@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Geronimo Dev From: Kevan Miller Subject: 2.0 release status Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:16:03 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Here's where things stand at the moment Specs We have a vote on 3 spec releases that have been held up by a CDDL licensing issue. After reviewing the issues, I don't think these specs have a problem. They are not built with CDDL licensed materials. We start to rebase our specs on CDDL licensed materials. I think this would make things cleaner. However, I don't think that it is necessary to do that now. Schemas We have an outstanding vote on two schema releases. These releases are built from CDDL licensed materials. At the moment, the license and notice files for the schema releases are not correct. I think we should do the following: move the schema source directories from our tck svn repository to our public repository, fix our license and notice files, and build schema releases from there. Note that both the schema source directories and the resultant schema binaries will have CDDL licensed elements. The current guidance that we have received from legal-discuss is that both source and binary CDDL is ok for us to release. We will need to be sure that our schemas follow all CDDL requirements. TX-Manager and Connector components The recently released 2.0 version of geronimo-connector has a problem. The geronimo-connector-2.0-tests.jar does not contain any classes. So, server builds fail when running tests. Matt has created a 2.0.1 release. We'll need to vote on this new release. 2.0 Release Matt and I have been working on updating branches/2.0.0 in preparation for a release. At the moment, the build is failing because of an xmlbeans version incompatibility. I haven't worked out the cause of this problem, yet. Once we're able to build, we can start testing and get a release vote started. This vote either cover the above specs/schemas/components releases or the vote would be dependent on separate release votes. --kevan