Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ginemesis@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.230 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=iACG+EZ8X/KyDNYJTZ5aax+tWFHSqvWmeRf6yWiOYTvyHZeWILhsukxYijHKOTBK/+6xb+M6peZuTtK52WfCULNsruy7soHikE/pn7BAf5Ba/mxOQ3FoEWamGN2lEO3RYKbbYnPPdBIf8xYnONFtcEC+Z9rv/cZYFrPYwqSPK8M=
Message-ID: <4e8584bd0708280624v64bf1a90i88cad4843d4bd6f7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:24:18 -0400
From: "Erik B. Craig" <ginemesis@gmail.com>
Reply-To: erik.craig@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding j2g to site
In-Reply-To: <73a75e430708280555v847b908jd2b7b262c238a17d@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_90118_10339468.1188307458718"
References: <4e8584bd0708231330k188d6bfehfc1b0a3f142920c5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <D8447B33-2AF5-4CFE-993C-76F0E1C176D6@hogstrom.org>
	 <73a75e430708280555v847b908jd2b7b262c238a17d@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_90118_10339468.1188307458718
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Seconding Jason's take on this.

On 8/28/07, Jason Warner <jaw981@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> Feature-wise, I think it'd be ready to take on the 1.0 nomenclature but
> I'd rather wait until when/if it gets moved out of sandbox.
>
> -- Jason Warner
>
> On 8/27/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> >
> > Erik, Jason and Viet.  This is really good.  Since we're making a
> > SNAPSHOT available is there some point where we should declare a 1.0 ?
> >
> > On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable
> > from within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved
> > logging/information output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of interest
> > out in the general open source community in moving applications from Jboss
> > to Geronimo (such as today's inquiry on theserverside.com), I feel as
> > though it would be of some benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our
> > confluence wiki (
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html) linked
> > somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking either as it's own
> > link under 'Subprojects', much as Development Tools, GBuild, or XBean are
> > situated, or as an addition inside the Development Tools page, much as the
> > current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there.
> >
> > I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional writing (beyond what
> > is on the wiki) if it were to be under it's own section, or a subsection of
> > development tools if necessary, but I think it would be good to get it up
> > and out there sooner rather than later, especially to coincide with the
> > recent release of 2.0.1 to perhaps show those out there remotely
> > interested in migrating, there are tools available to assist and perhaps
> > 'hold their hand' a bit.
> >
> >
> > Thoughts? Comments? Objections?
> >
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Erik B. Craig
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Erik B. Craig

------=_Part_90118_10339468.1188307458718
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Seconding Jason&#39;s take on this.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/28/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jason Warner</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:jaw981@gmail.com">jaw981@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Matt,<br><br>Feature-wise, I think it&#39;d be ready to take on the 1.0 nomenclature but I&#39;d rather wait until when/if it gets moved out of sandbox.<br><span class="sg"><br>-- Jason Warner</span><div><span class="e" id="q_114ac8b7991408be_2">
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/27/07, 
<b class="gmail_sendername">Matt Hogstrom</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:matt@hogstrom.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">matt@hogstrom.org</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

<div>Erik, Jason and Viet.&nbsp; This is really good.&nbsp; Since we&#39;re making a SNAPSHOT available is there some point where we should declare a 1.0 ?<div><span><div><br></div><div>
<br><div><div>On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite">All,<br><br>After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable from within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved logging/information output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of interest out in the general open source community in moving applications from Jboss to Geronimo (such as today&#39;s inquiry on 
<a href="http://theserverside.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">theserverside.com</a>), I feel as though it would be of some benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our confluence wiki (
<a href="http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html</a>) linked somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking either as it&#39;s own link under &#39;Subprojects&#39;, much as Development Tools, GBuild, or XBean are situated, or as an addition inside the Development Tools page, much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there. 
<br><br>I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional writing (beyond what is on the wiki) if it were to be under it&#39;s own section, or a subsection of development tools if necessary, but I think it would be good to get it up and out there sooner rather than later, especially to coincide with the recent release of 
2.0.1 to perhaps show those out there remotely interested in migrating, there are tools available to assist and perhaps &#39;hold their hand&#39; a bit.<br clear="all"><br><br>Thoughts? Comments? Objections?<br><br>Thanks 
<br>-- <br>Erik B. Craig</blockquote></div><br></div></span></div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</span></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Erik B. Craig

------=_Part_90118_10339468.1188307458718--