geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: proper behavior for "deploy list-targets" with multiple repositories when server is not running
Date Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:57:17 GMT

On Aug 7, 2007, at 8:01 PM, Donald Woods wrote:

> Hmmm... sounds like we need an Admin Portlet to add/remove  
> additional config-stores, so they get registered in both config.xml  
> and offline-deployer-config.xml at the same time....

That seems like it's probably a good idea.... are there cases where  
you would want the offline deployer to  know about a different set of  
config-stores than the server?  At first I thought perhaps a farm  
situation might be one but I'd expect such a setup to share the app  
deployment in the main config-store and configure each app in the  
server's individual config.xml's

david jencks

> -Donald
> David Jencks wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2007, at 5:14 PM, Ted Kirby wrote:
>>> When the server is running, the list-targets command lists  
>>> additional
>>> repositories that may have been configured.  When the server is not
>>> running, only the base repository is listed.
>>> What should the correct behavior be?
>>> The list of repositories are kept in config.xml and are not  
>>> available
>>> remotely when the server is not running.  It seems nothing should be
>>> returned by list-targets when the server is down.
>> I don't think that's quite right.  Isn't the list always that of  
>> the set of config-stores running in the relevant kernel, which for  
>> the offline deployer is typically just the "main" config-store?  I  
>> think if you want to have the offline deployer deploy to more  
>> config-stores you can add configurations that start those config  
>> stores to the offline-deployer-config.xml
>> I think the current behavior is fine.
>> thanks
>> david jencks

View raw message