geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Warner" <jaw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Adding j2g to site
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:55:58 GMT
Matt,

Feature-wise, I think it'd be ready to take on the 1.0 nomenclature but I'd
rather wait until when/if it gets moved out of sandbox.

-- Jason Warner

On 8/27/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
> Erik, Jason and Viet.  This is really good.  Since we're making a SNAPSHOT
> available is there some point where we should declare a 1.0 ?
>
> On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
>
> All,
>
> After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable from
> within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved logging/information
> output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of interest out in the general
> open source community in moving applications from Jboss to Geronimo (such as
> today's inquiry on theserverside.com), I feel as though it would be of
> some benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our confluence wiki (http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html)
> linked somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking either as
> it's own link under 'Subprojects', much as Development Tools, GBuild, or
> XBean are situated, or as an addition inside the Development Tools page,
> much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there.
>
> I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional writing (beyond what
> is on the wiki) if it were to be under it's own section, or a subsection of
> development tools if necessary, but I think it would be good to get it up
> and out there sooner rather than later, especially to coincide with the
> recent release of 2.0.1 to perhaps show those out there remotely
> interested in migrating, there are tools available to assist and perhaps
> 'hold their hand' a bit.
>
>
> Thoughts? Comments? Objections?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Erik B. Craig
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message