geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anita Kulshreshtha <a_kuls...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Standalone Geronimo 2.0.1 client
Date Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:13:25 GMT

--- David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:

> 
> On Aug 30, 2007, at 5:32 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
> 
> >     I have successfully used
> > props.put("java.naming.provider.url", "127.0.0.1:4201")
> >    to run stand alone remote client to access MEJB. Should we be
> using
> > ejbd://?
> 
> We should, yes.  If you don't specify a protocol, we assume ejbd.
> 
> > 1 The JNDI name for MEJB is
> > MEJBGBean/MEJB/javax.management.j2ee.Management.
> > Is it possible to have it as ejb/mgmt/MEJB?
> 
> We can as of the code I checked in yesterday specify a new jndi  
> format for an ejb-jar.  So we could use  "ejb/mgmt/{deploymentId}"  
> for that resulting in "ejb/mgmt/MEJB".  If that's what people want.

JSR77.7.1.4 states ...."It is recommended that a default name of
ejb/mgmt/MEJB be used whenever possible". I would like us to use this.

Thanks
Anita

> 
> > 2. Why does MEJB not show up in the JNDIViewer in console?
> 
> That I do not know.
> 
> -David
> 
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto
Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ 

Mime
View raw message