geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Erik B. Craig" <gineme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Adding j2g to site
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:24:18 GMT
Seconding Jason's take on this.

On 8/28/07, Jason Warner <jaw981@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> Feature-wise, I think it'd be ready to take on the 1.0 nomenclature but
> I'd rather wait until when/if it gets moved out of sandbox.
>
> -- Jason Warner
>
> On 8/27/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> >
> > Erik, Jason and Viet.  This is really good.  Since we're making a
> > SNAPSHOT available is there some point where we should declare a 1.0 ?
> >
> > On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable
> > from within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved
> > logging/information output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of interest
> > out in the general open source community in moving applications from Jboss
> > to Geronimo (such as today's inquiry on theserverside.com), I feel as
> > though it would be of some benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our
> > confluence wiki (
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html) linked
> > somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking either as it's own
> > link under 'Subprojects', much as Development Tools, GBuild, or XBean are
> > situated, or as an addition inside the Development Tools page, much as the
> > current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there.
> >
> > I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional writing (beyond what
> > is on the wiki) if it were to be under it's own section, or a subsection of
> > development tools if necessary, but I think it would be good to get it up
> > and out there sooner rather than later, especially to coincide with the
> > recent release of 2.0.1 to perhaps show those out there remotely
> > interested in migrating, there are tools available to assist and perhaps
> > 'hold their hand' a bit.
> >
> >
> > Thoughts? Comments? Objections?
> >
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Erik B. Craig
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Erik B. Craig

Mime
View raw message