geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hernan Cunico <>
Subject Re: Adding j2g to site
Date Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:21:48 GMT
If we have some working tool that facilitates migrating to Geronimo I think it's definitively
worth mentioning on the main web site.
It seems to me that a place somewhere closer to the dev tools subproject would be a better

I see there are two documents on the wiki (for Geronimo 1.1 and 2.0 respectively), you folks
would have to work on some shorter version (a couple of paragraphs) describing what this tool
does and how so it can be included on the web site.

I don't really know much about this tool entrails so I'll wait on others for some more input.
But if there is a tool that help users adopt Geronimo I'm all for it ;-)


Erik B. Craig wrote:
> All,
> After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable 
> from within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved 
> logging/information output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of 
> interest out in the general open source community in moving applications 
> from Jboss to Geronimo (such as today's inquiry on 
> <>), I feel as though it would be of some 
> benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our confluence wiki ( 
> linked 
> somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking either as it's 
> own link under 'Subprojects', much as Development Tools, GBuild, or 
> XBean are situated, or as an addition inside the Development Tools page, 
> much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there.
> I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional writing (beyond what 
> is on the wiki) if it were to be under it's own section, or a subsection 
> of development tools if necessary, but I think it would be good to get 
> it up and out there sooner rather than later, especially to coincide 
> with the recent release of 2.0.1 to perhaps show those out there 
> remotely interested in migrating, there are tools available to assist 
> and perhaps 'hold their hand' a bit.
> Thoughts? Comments? Objections?
> Thanks
> -- 
> Erik B. Craig

View raw message