geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vamsavardhana Reddy" <c1vams...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.0-M4 is still under branches
Date Mon, 06 Aug 2007 10:50:32 GMT
Yes, it does :o)

Vamsi

On 8/6/07, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
>
> Yay, doesn't cleaning up feel good, all nice and shinny :-P
> --jason
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
>
> Removed in Revision: 563088
>
> --vamsi
>
> On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom <matt@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> >
> > I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll
> > delete it.
> >
> >
> > On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
> >
> > > m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there.
> > > it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4
> > > branch.  The branch should probably be removed.
> > >
> > > --jason
> > >
> > >
> > > On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> > >
> > >> This may not be a big or important (??) thing...  G 2.0-M4 is still
> > >> under branches.
> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M4/ .
> > >> We should tag the release as we have done for other milestone
> > >> releases.
> > >>
> > >> Vamsi
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message