geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jacek Laskowski" <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>
Subject Re: Merge ettiquette
Date Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:03:54 GMT
On 8/17/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I've noticed that sometimes when people merge bug fixes/changes from
> one branch to another they don't include the jira number from the
> original commit.  This makes it exceedingly hard to figure out which
> branches something has been fixed in from the jira issue or the
> commit logs.
>
> In the future can everyone please be very careful to include jira
> numbers on all branch-to-branch merges when the original commit was
> associated with a jira entry.  I usually provide a bit of backup by
> commenting on the jira entry with the merge revision number as well.

I'm going to add it to our documentation so it won't disappear and
wonder where it should end up. "Project Guidelines" [1] seems to be a
goot fit, but I'm not so sure as bylaws != guidelines (?). "Apache
Geronimo Development Process" [2] is good, too. Unless there're better
places I'll make the choice.

[1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Project+Guidelines
[2] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Development+Process

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Mime
View raw message