Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18473 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2007 17:23:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2007 17:23:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 32551 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2007 17:23:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 32481 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2007 17:23:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 32470 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2007 17:23:16 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:23:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ammulder@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.177] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:23:11 -0700 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so2193600wah for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:22:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=L5RT7tIMjGEDzVidGPIsbWjyOz0y66t3UYGv8wimICJ1DBRwg95NMENeWeSrUMhRAtT6za0jGZ6GyhFsn/SSrnyXPL4DzTDNbpEocdxMMIuRUP7ZREP1qfXs9CBpA8FTH3GXgY2gY2nXtAGZLSKxYhH05r234tUEqDO4s+3ikdM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=omD173h0bU3rSfCEK80Db3yXn/vDsaoezlHRMQY5ukMlhZ1ehbXyIIO3obXM4oAA/hswDk43AhNhfECQRQibhwEigcJBENsov58ijKPbNXZwMgJvfto7D+CHOWOQ2seyOF94foO+9Fonv50LblGN+P5oMGVh1cedD8qiWjZ2WsI= Received: by 10.114.13.1 with SMTP id 1mr595617wam.1184692971232; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.107.5 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <74e15baa0707171022v35adc663wcc0bcfed82a54ff@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:22:51 -0400 From: "Aaron Mulder" Sender: ammulder@gmail.com To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Should we cancel 1.2? In-Reply-To: <85E87C6B-7AA7-4695-9BE0-0331FBD080AC@iq80.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <85E87C6B-7AA7-4695-9BE0-0331FBD080AC@iq80.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: ec4bfc9c43797f8e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What were the benefits of 1.2? All I remember was that the build changed to Maven 2. If there's a known bug with more than one connected user, and limited benefits compared to the upcoming 2.0, and also none of the developers want to support it, I don't think a release is in our interest. But it's quite possible I'm forgetting something that would make it a compelling upgrade from 1.1. Thanks, Aaron On 7/16/07, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > 1.2 has been sitting in a branch for well over 6 months now. > Originally, it was going to be delayed so some bugs could be "quickly > fixed", but it doesn't look like that is ever going to happen. I'm > not really interested in being the manager for this release anymore, > but if there is good interest in getting this released in, say, the > next two weeks, I'm willing to continue on. Otherwise, someone else > can take over. > > So, does anyone care about releasing 1.2? > > -dain > >