Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of linsun.unc@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.229 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=BJh6COl0zYbfPIscWGwJIqrruRsBbcuEMk7RRoqMm1ZpLpy2V4sooola+l6KdMutG9sDTdXKk1yf5Y9fZqkgkiDyhAL0wR469oygPe1rwkltiPrdzSPVrDwJKLd0ztM8WfCBr9oFp8fU7SbmvFp81B4l08fYDX9MuuBSNO2u7b4=
Message-ID: <468F020E.70407@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 23:01:34 -0400
From: Lin Sun <linsun.unc@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet
 and StAX
References: <CC02410F-5D03-4F84-BBB3-3A679480CADD@hogstrom.org>
	 <7433128A-B3B3-4353-A9F3-2566F719A8A6@hogstrom.org>
	 <0D1408C8-71BB-4E4F-BDB4-E381CF9DBA6E@yahoo.com>
 <5eb405c70707061206p25003882icd0b9081b5b89bca@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5eb405c70707061206p25003882icd0b9081b5b89bca@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+1 on releasing these specs.

Lin

Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in
> order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for
> Axis2).
> 
> Jarek
> 
> On 7/4/07, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right
>> now (not it!) I think we should release the existing stax, jacc and
>> activation specs.
>>
>> Either that or delete the questionable scm sections since it doesn't
>> seem to be actually possible to get them right and release that.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>> > I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's   The
>> > other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had
>> > issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your critical eyes.
>> >
>> > On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> >
>> >> Please review the specifications located at http://
>> >> people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/
>> >>
>> >> We are voting these in a block.  Failures will be removed from the
>> >> block and others will proceed forward.
>> >>
>> >> Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>