Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=iAjYfDRhRg56Y6mMXe7VudFN5Kx7xGMY94fAj2vPGmmhhyUVmHKM/XLkbUM8esFl3xyU1ljLToV7878GtSJATThzOs4r+mVA0edSOUU7PsKAbbM8DZhh8nDL3a0/NAwgmp0SaJITrT5TW31JgRAxGr5tlyioSMs5qqgDWcd0g5E=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <0BCDBFBD-9324-4EE8-B061-FB79456D0F43@gmail.com>
References: <c278ac970707181110l352ae0e0h6857ca94631f154f@mail.gmail.com>
 <469E78BC.90109@apache.org>
 <c278ac970707181446x5bea6d68j65f399cb0d576f68@mail.gmail.com>
 <469EC208.8050005@apache.org>
 <c278ac970707190451n28183f0bx37a0d311d033b47f@mail.gmail.com>
 <c278ac970707190611q1b53a0fboa17deb3be4d80080@mail.gmail.com>
 <0BCDBFBD-9324-4EE8-B061-FB79456D0F43@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <2EC3F327-DDF8-487D-9214-F7039B373BC8@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release v1.1 of geronimo-schema-jee_5.
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:18:14 -0700
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

This file is generated by xmlbeans compiliation, so the only way to  
remove the questionable contents is with different source files.

I don't completely understand the reasoning on why the current file  
is unacceptable, as we are not in fact distributing the contents of  
the schemas, just some text that applies to them.

However if we want to remove this we could:

1. wait for craig russell to finish navigating the mine-infested sun  
legal waters and get some more clearly licensed schemas available
2. use our typed up schemas to generate the xmlbeans classes (in  
which case we should move all this stuff back to the public project
3. edit the secret copy of the xsds in the tck project to leave out  
these notices before running the xmlbeans compiler.

or
4. move to jaxb now.

I think (2) might be the most reasonable if we have all the schemas  
typed up.   Does anyone know of a binary comparison tool to see if  
the generated classes from the 2 sets of schemas are reasonably similar?

I guess it might be worth asking Craig if there is light at the end  
of the tunnel?

thanks
david jencks

On Jul 19, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

>
> On Jul 19, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
>> Correction.
>>
>> The released j2ee-1.4 schema jars are here
>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/ 
>> schema/geronimo-schema-j2ee_1.4/1.1/
>>
>> The earlier link I posted are for our *deployed* 1.1-SNAPS of jee5
>> schema... not *released*.
>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/ 
>> geronimo/schema/geronimo-schema-jee_5/1.1-SNAPSHOT/
>>
>> Neverthless, they all have *.xsb files in them.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Prasad
>>
>> On 7/19/07, Prasad Kashyap <goyathlay.geronimo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The 1.1-SNAPSHOT that we released earlier has the XSBs in them too.
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/ 
>>> geronimo/schema/geronimo-schema-jee_5/1.1-SNAPSHOT/
>>>
>>> so i guess this is ok too ?
>
> IMO, it's not OK and needs to be fixed. Can you take a look at this  
> Prasad? If not, I'll have a look, when I can...
>
> --kevan
>
>